This browser is too old to run Achievable.

Update it, or open this page in a current version of Chrome, Safari, Firefox or Edge. On an iPhone or iPad, update iOS: every browser there runs on the version of Safari that comes with it.

Achievable logoAchievable logo
Life & Health
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Resources
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
1. General Insurance Concepts
2. Producer Roles and Receipt Types
3. Principles of Life Insurance
4. Underwriting
5. Term Life Insurance
6. Whole Life Insurance
7. Variable Insurance Products
8. Group Life Insurance
9. Life Insurance Provisions
10. Annuities
11. Taxation of Life Insurance Products
12. Qualified Retirement Plans
13. Health Insurance Basics
14. Required Policy Provisions
15. Optional Policy Provisions
16. Medical Expense Insurance
17. Group Health Insurance
18. The Affordable Care Act (ACA)
19. Disability Income Insurance
20. Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance
21. Long Term Care Insurance
22. Dental Insurance
23. Section 125 Plans and Limited Policies
24. Federal Government Programs
25. Medigap and Medicaid
26. Health Insurance Taxation
Wrapping Up
Achievable logoAchievable logo
Not found
Achievable Life & Health
48. Life Insurance in Practice

Business Uses of Life Insurance

14 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

A business owner’s death creates three problems at once: the heirs hold an interest they may not be able to run, the surviving owners must deal with people they did not choose, and the business may lose the person its customers or lenders relied on. Life insurance answers each problem with cash at the moment of death. A funded buy-sell agreement is worked from valuation through premium and payout, key person coverage is sized, and a split dollar arrangement is run for five years. The names and figures are invented examples.

Funding a Buy-Sell Agreement

Ferndale Precision Tooling LLC is owned by Anita Rossi, 58, who holds 60%, and Kevin Mbeki, 44, who holds 40%. The LLC is taxed as a partnership. Their buy-sell agreement says that when one owner dies, the survivor buys the deceased owner’s interest from the estate at an agreed price. The owners set the value of the business at $1,500,000, so the price of Anita’s interest is $900,000 and the price of Kevin’s is $600,000. Without funding, the survivor would have to borrow or pay in installments, and the estate would be left holding an interest it cannot sell.

Cross Purchase

Under a cross purchase, each owner buys, owns and is the beneficiary of a policy on the other. Kevin buys $900,000 on Anita, and Anita buys $600,000 on Kevin. If Anita dies, Kevin collects $900,000 as beneficiary and pays it to her estate for her 60%, and he now owns the whole company. Because Kevin bought the interest himself, his cost in it rises by what he paid.

The premiums show a weakness. Suppose the policy on Anita, at 58, costs $13,500 a year and the policy on Kevin, at 44, costs $4,800. Kevin, the 40% owner, pays $13,500. Anita, who owns 60%, pays $4,800. The younger, smaller owner carries most of the cost because the older owner is the more expensive life to insure. The owners can bring the payments into line by adjusting compensation or by agreeing to a different split of premiums, but the agreement has to say so.

The second weakness is how fast the policies multiply. Each owner insures every other owner, so the number of policies is the number of owners times the number of owners less one.

Owners Policies needed
2 2
3 6
4 12
5 20

A company with five owners would have to buy and keep track of 20 policies. That is the main reason larger companies prefer the entity form.

Entity Purchase

Under an entity purchase, the business owns one policy on each owner, pays the premiums and is the beneficiary. When an owner dies, the company uses the proceeds to buy the deceased owner’s interest. In a corporation this is the stock redemption plan. The survivor’s ownership percentage rises because the interest is retired: if Anita dies and the LLC redeems her 60%, Kevin’s 40% becomes 100% of what remains.

Using the same premiums, the LLC pays $13,500 plus $4,800, or $18,300 a year, and the cost reaches both owners through lower company profit, in proportion to their shares. Two policies cover two owners, and adding a third owner adds only one more. If an owner is also an employee of the company, the company’s ownership of the policy also brings in the employer-owned policy rules described under key person coverage.

The Gap That Appears Later

A policy fixes the dollars, and the price in the agreement can drift. Suppose three years later the business is worth $2,100,000. Anita’s 60% would now be $1,260,000, but the policy on her pays $900,000. The shortfall is $360,000, and the survivor must borrow it, pay it over time or renegotiate with the estate. A good agreement is reviewed whenever the valuation changes, at least once a year, and the insurance is increased to match.

Three points complete the picture.

  • Who the insured must be. Co-owners ordinarily have an insurable interest in the other’s life, and Michigan requires the insured’s written consent where an individual insures another person for the buyer’s own benefit and the policy is $10,000 or more. The insured’s signature on the application counts as consent (MCL 500.2211(1), (2)).
  • Change of structure. If the owners later move from a cross purchase to an entity purchase, the policies must be transferred. A transfer of a life policy for value can make most of the death benefit taxable, unless the transfer fits a statutory exception, such as a transfer to the insured, to a partner of the insured, to a partnership in which the insured is a partner, or to a corporation in which the insured is a shareholder or officer (26 U.S.C. 101(a)(2)). The tax result is worked later with the other income tax rules.
  • The lawyer’s role. The agreement itself is a contract drafted by an attorney. The producer supplies the policy and the premium, and does not write the terms.

Key Person Coverage

A key person policy protects the business from losing someone whose work produces its income. The business owns the policy, pays the premium and is the beneficiary. The amount is an estimate of the loss, and a common method is the profit the key person produces during the time it takes to replace the person.

Ngozi Adeyemi runs sales for a Grand Rapids distributor and is responsible for $1,200,000 of revenue a year. The company’s contribution margin on that revenue is 18%, so her work yields $1,200,000 × 0.18, or $216,000 a year. The company expects replacing her to take 18 months, during which the margin is lost: $216,000 × 1.5, or $324,000. Recruiting and training a successor adds $58,000. The estimated loss is $382,000, and the company buys $400,000.

Two rules apply because the employer is the beneficiary. Michigan gives an employer an insurable interest in its directors, officers, managers and nonmanagement employees, but only with the insured’s written consent. For nonmanagement and retired employees the coverage is also limited to an amount reasonably commensurate with the employer’s projected unfunded liabilities for employee benefit plans (MCL 500.2210(2)). The federal rule is stricter in its own way. When an employer owns a policy on an employee, the death benefit is tax free beyond the premiums paid only if two things are true. Before the policy is issued, the employee must have been told in writing of the intent to insure and the maximum face amount, consented in writing to the coverage, including its continuing after employment ends, and been told that the employer will be a beneficiary (26 U.S.C. 101(j)(4)). The insured must also fall within an exception, such as having been an employee within the 12 months before death, being a director or a highly compensated employee when the policy was issued, or having the proceeds paid to the insured’s family or used to buy the insured’s equity interest from them (26 U.S.C. 101(j)(2)). A producer who sells key person coverage gets these papers signed at the application, and keeps copies.

Split Dollar and Executive Bonus

Both arrangements help a business reward an employee with life insurance.

Split Dollar

In a typical split dollar plan, the employer owns the policy and the employee names the beneficiary. The employer pays each year an amount equal to that year’s increase in cash value, and the employee pays the rest of the premium. At the employee’s death or when the plan ends, the employer recovers what it paid.

Take a $500,000 policy on an employee aged 45 with an annual premium of $9,000.

Year Cash value at year end Employer pays (increase in cash value) Employee pays
1 $1,200 $1,200 $7,800
2 $4,600 $3,400 $5,600
3 $8,300 $3,700 $5,300
4 $12,300 $4,000 $5,000
5 $16,500 $4,200 $4,800

The employee has paid $28,500 over the five years, and the employer $16,500, which equals the cash value. If the employee dies in year 5, the employer takes $16,500 from the proceeds, and the beneficiary receives the other $483,500. As the cash value grows, the employer’s share rises and the employee’s falls, which is why the arrangement suits an employee who wants coverage at a low early cost. The employer’s recovery is protected by the cash value in every year, so its risk is small. The tax treatment of the employee’s share depends on how the arrangement is documented and is a matter for the plan’s tax adviser, so a producer does not quote it.

Executive Bonus

An executive bonus plan is simpler. The employer pays the executive a bonus equal to the premium, and the executive owns the policy and names the beneficiary. The bonus is compensation to the executive, so the executive pays income tax on it, and the employer generally deducts reasonable compensation. Unlike split dollar, the employer has no claim on the policy. Employers sometimes add a restriction on the policy so that the executive cannot surrender it freely, but the policy is the executive’s.

Sidenote
Exam point

Cross purchase: owners insure each other, and the number of policies is owners times owners minus one. Entity purchase: the business owns one policy per owner. Key person: the business is owner, premium payer and beneficiary. Split dollar: the employer pays the increase in cash value and recovers it at death.

Lesson summary

  • A buy-sell agreement fixes a price and funds it with insurance so that the survivors can buy the deceased owner’s interest. Cross purchase has each owner insure the others, and entity purchase has the business insure each owner.
  • In the worked case the older owner’s policy cost $13,500 and the younger owner’s $4,800, so a cross purchase put most of the cost on the younger, smaller owner. The entity paid $18,300 in total.
  • The number of cross purchase policies is the number of owners times the number of owners minus one, so five owners need 20 policies.
  • A buy-sell price must be revisited as the business grows. A value of $2,100,000 made the $900,000 policy $360,000 short.
  • A person who insures another for his or her own benefit needs the insured’s written consent on policies of $10,000 or more in Michigan, and the insured’s signature on the application counts (MCL 500.2211).
  • Key person coverage is sized by the profit lost until a replacement is productive plus replacement cost. Michigan requires an employer to have the written consent of the employee insured, and federal law requires written notice and consent, and an exception such as recent employment, for the death benefit to remain tax free beyond the premiums paid.
  • In split dollar the employer pays the increase in cash value each year and recovers its payments from the proceeds, and in an executive bonus plan the executive owns the policy and pays tax on the bonus.

Buy-Sell Agreement Purpose

  • Death creates three problems: heirs can’t run the business, survivors stuck with unchosen partners, business loses key talent
  • Life insurance provides cash at death to fund a pre-set purchase price
  • Agreement sets valuation; insurance must cover the price of each owner’s share

Cross Purchase Method

  • Each owner individually buys, owns, and is beneficiary of a policy on each other owner
  • Survivor collects death benefit and pays estate directly for the interest; survivor’s cost basis rises by amount paid
  • Weakness: premium burden falls disproportionately on younger/minority owners (insuring an older owner costs more)
  • Weakness: policy count = n×(n−1) — 2 owners need 2 policies, 5 owners need 20

Entity Purchase Method

  • Business itself owns one policy per owner, pays all premiums, and is beneficiary
  • Company uses proceeds to redeem deceased’s interest (called stock redemption in a corporation)
  • Survivor’s percentage automatically rises since interest is retired, not purchased
  • Only needs one policy per owner (scales better for larger ownership groups)
  • If owner is also employee, employer-owned policy tax rules (IRC 101(j)) also apply

Valuation Gap & Legal Points

  • Fixed policy amount can fall short if business value grows — agreement/coverage should be reviewed at least annually
  • Michigan requires insured’s written consent (signature on application suffices) for policies ≥$10,000 (MCL 500.2211)
  • Changing structures (cross purchase ↔ entity) requires policy transfers; transfer-for-value can make death benefit taxable unless a statutory exception applies (IRC 101(a)(2))
  • Attorney drafts the buy-sell contract; producer only supplies the policy/premium

Key Person Coverage

  • Business owns policy, pays premium, and is beneficiary to protect against loss of a revenue-critical employee
  • Amount typically = lost profit during replacement period + replacement/training costs
  • Michigan requires insurable interest plus written consent from insured employee; nonmanagement/retired employee coverage limited to amount tied to unfunded benefit plan liabilities (MCL 500.2210(2))
  • Federal tax-free treatment (IRC 101(j)) requires advance written notice/consent before issuance, plus insured must meet an exception (e.g., recent employee, director, highly compensated, or proceeds benefit insured’s family/equity purchase)

Split Dollar vs. Executive Bonus

  • Split dollar: employer owns policy, pays annual increase in cash value; employee pays remainder and names beneficiary; employer recovers its paid-in amount at death/plan end, employee/beneficiary gets the rest
  • Employer’s risk is low since cash value always covers its recovery amount; good for low-cost early coverage to employee
  • Executive bonus: employer pays bonus equal to premium (taxable income to executive); executive owns policy outright and names beneficiary; employer has no claim on proceeds
  • Tax treatment of employee’s share in split dollar depends on plan documentation — referred to tax adviser, not quoted by producer

Sign up for free to take 14 quiz questions on this topic

Previous
Next  | 48.10 Taxation of Life Insurance and Annuities Worked
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Business Uses of Life Insurance

A business owner’s death creates three problems at once: the heirs hold an interest they may not be able to run, the surviving owners must deal with people they did not choose, and the business may lose the person its customers or lenders relied on. Life insurance answers each problem with cash at the moment of death. A funded buy-sell agreement is worked from valuation through premium and payout, key person coverage is sized, and a split dollar arrangement is run for five years. The names and figures are invented examples.

Funding a Buy-Sell Agreement

Ferndale Precision Tooling LLC is owned by Anita Rossi, 58, who holds 60%, and Kevin Mbeki, 44, who holds 40%. The LLC is taxed as a partnership. Their buy-sell agreement says that when one owner dies, the survivor buys the deceased owner’s interest from the estate at an agreed price. The owners set the value of the business at $1,500,000, so the price of Anita’s interest is $900,000 and the price of Kevin’s is $600,000. Without funding, the survivor would have to borrow or pay in installments, and the estate would be left holding an interest it cannot sell.

Cross Purchase

Under a cross purchase, each owner buys, owns and is the beneficiary of a policy on the other. Kevin buys $900,000 on Anita, and Anita buys $600,000 on Kevin. If Anita dies, Kevin collects $900,000 as beneficiary and pays it to her estate for her 60%, and he now owns the whole company. Because Kevin bought the interest himself, his cost in it rises by what he paid.

The premiums show a weakness. Suppose the policy on Anita, at 58, costs $13,500 a year and the policy on Kevin, at 44, costs $4,800. Kevin, the 40% owner, pays $13,500. Anita, who owns 60%, pays $4,800. The younger, smaller owner carries most of the cost because the older owner is the more expensive life to insure. The owners can bring the payments into line by adjusting compensation or by agreeing to a different split of premiums, but the agreement has to say so.

The second weakness is how fast the policies multiply. Each owner insures every other owner, so the number of policies is the number of owners times the number of owners less one.

Owners Policies needed
2 2
3 6
4 12
5 20

A company with five owners would have to buy and keep track of 20 policies. That is the main reason larger companies prefer the entity form.

Entity Purchase

Under an entity purchase, the business owns one policy on each owner, pays the premiums and is the beneficiary. When an owner dies, the company uses the proceeds to buy the deceased owner’s interest. In a corporation this is the stock redemption plan. The survivor’s ownership percentage rises because the interest is retired: if Anita dies and the LLC redeems her 60%, Kevin’s 40% becomes 100% of what remains.

Using the same premiums, the LLC pays $13,500 plus $4,800, or $18,300 a year, and the cost reaches both owners through lower company profit, in proportion to their shares. Two policies cover two owners, and adding a third owner adds only one more. If an owner is also an employee of the company, the company’s ownership of the policy also brings in the employer-owned policy rules described under key person coverage.

The Gap That Appears Later

A policy fixes the dollars, and the price in the agreement can drift. Suppose three years later the business is worth $2,100,000. Anita’s 60% would now be $1,260,000, but the policy on her pays $900,000. The shortfall is $360,000, and the survivor must borrow it, pay it over time or renegotiate with the estate. A good agreement is reviewed whenever the valuation changes, at least once a year, and the insurance is increased to match.

Three points complete the picture.

  • Who the insured must be. Co-owners ordinarily have an insurable interest in the other’s life, and Michigan requires the insured’s written consent where an individual insures another person for the buyer’s own benefit and the policy is $10,000 or more. The insured’s signature on the application counts as consent (MCL 500.2211(1), (2)).
  • Change of structure. If the owners later move from a cross purchase to an entity purchase, the policies must be transferred. A transfer of a life policy for value can make most of the death benefit taxable, unless the transfer fits a statutory exception, such as a transfer to the insured, to a partner of the insured, to a partnership in which the insured is a partner, or to a corporation in which the insured is a shareholder or officer (26 U.S.C. 101(a)(2)). The tax result is worked later with the other income tax rules.
  • The lawyer’s role. The agreement itself is a contract drafted by an attorney. The producer supplies the policy and the premium, and does not write the terms.

Key Person Coverage

A key person policy protects the business from losing someone whose work produces its income. The business owns the policy, pays the premium and is the beneficiary. The amount is an estimate of the loss, and a common method is the profit the key person produces during the time it takes to replace the person.

Ngozi Adeyemi runs sales for a Grand Rapids distributor and is responsible for $1,200,000 of revenue a year. The company’s contribution margin on that revenue is 18%, so her work yields $1,200,000 × 0.18, or $216,000 a year. The company expects replacing her to take 18 months, during which the margin is lost: $216,000 × 1.5, or $324,000. Recruiting and training a successor adds $58,000. The estimated loss is $382,000, and the company buys $400,000.

Two rules apply because the employer is the beneficiary. Michigan gives an employer an insurable interest in its directors, officers, managers and nonmanagement employees, but only with the insured’s written consent. For nonmanagement and retired employees the coverage is also limited to an amount reasonably commensurate with the employer’s projected unfunded liabilities for employee benefit plans (MCL 500.2210(2)). The federal rule is stricter in its own way. When an employer owns a policy on an employee, the death benefit is tax free beyond the premiums paid only if two things are true. Before the policy is issued, the employee must have been told in writing of the intent to insure and the maximum face amount, consented in writing to the coverage, including its continuing after employment ends, and been told that the employer will be a beneficiary (26 U.S.C. 101(j)(4)). The insured must also fall within an exception, such as having been an employee within the 12 months before death, being a director or a highly compensated employee when the policy was issued, or having the proceeds paid to the insured’s family or used to buy the insured’s equity interest from them (26 U.S.C. 101(j)(2)). A producer who sells key person coverage gets these papers signed at the application, and keeps copies.

Split Dollar and Executive Bonus

Both arrangements help a business reward an employee with life insurance.

Split Dollar

In a typical split dollar plan, the employer owns the policy and the employee names the beneficiary. The employer pays each year an amount equal to that year’s increase in cash value, and the employee pays the rest of the premium. At the employee’s death or when the plan ends, the employer recovers what it paid.

Take a $500,000 policy on an employee aged 45 with an annual premium of $9,000.

Year Cash value at year end Employer pays (increase in cash value) Employee pays
1 $1,200 $1,200 $7,800
2 $4,600 $3,400 $5,600
3 $8,300 $3,700 $5,300
4 $12,300 $4,000 $5,000
5 $16,500 $4,200 $4,800

The employee has paid $28,500 over the five years, and the employer $16,500, which equals the cash value. If the employee dies in year 5, the employer takes $16,500 from the proceeds, and the beneficiary receives the other $483,500. As the cash value grows, the employer’s share rises and the employee’s falls, which is why the arrangement suits an employee who wants coverage at a low early cost. The employer’s recovery is protected by the cash value in every year, so its risk is small. The tax treatment of the employee’s share depends on how the arrangement is documented and is a matter for the plan’s tax adviser, so a producer does not quote it.

Executive Bonus

An executive bonus plan is simpler. The employer pays the executive a bonus equal to the premium, and the executive owns the policy and names the beneficiary. The bonus is compensation to the executive, so the executive pays income tax on it, and the employer generally deducts reasonable compensation. Unlike split dollar, the employer has no claim on the policy. Employers sometimes add a restriction on the policy so that the executive cannot surrender it freely, but the policy is the executive’s.

Sidenote
Exam point

Cross purchase: owners insure each other, and the number of policies is owners times owners minus one. Entity purchase: the business owns one policy per owner. Key person: the business is owner, premium payer and beneficiary. Split dollar: the employer pays the increase in cash value and recovers it at death.

Lesson summary

  • A buy-sell agreement fixes a price and funds it with insurance so that the survivors can buy the deceased owner’s interest. Cross purchase has each owner insure the others, and entity purchase has the business insure each owner.
  • In the worked case the older owner’s policy cost $13,500 and the younger owner’s $4,800, so a cross purchase put most of the cost on the younger, smaller owner. The entity paid $18,300 in total.
  • The number of cross purchase policies is the number of owners times the number of owners minus one, so five owners need 20 policies.
  • A buy-sell price must be revisited as the business grows. A value of $2,100,000 made the $900,000 policy $360,000 short.
  • A person who insures another for his or her own benefit needs the insured’s written consent on policies of $10,000 or more in Michigan, and the insured’s signature on the application counts (MCL 500.2211).
  • Key person coverage is sized by the profit lost until a replacement is productive plus replacement cost. Michigan requires an employer to have the written consent of the employee insured, and federal law requires written notice and consent, and an exception such as recent employment, for the death benefit to remain tax free beyond the premiums paid.
  • In split dollar the employer pays the increase in cash value each year and recovers its payments from the proceeds, and in an executive bonus plan the executive owns the policy and pays tax on the bonus.
Key points

Buy-Sell Agreement Purpose

  • Death creates three problems: heirs can’t run the business, survivors stuck with unchosen partners, business loses key talent
  • Life insurance provides cash at death to fund a pre-set purchase price
  • Agreement sets valuation; insurance must cover the price of each owner’s share

Cross Purchase Method

  • Each owner individually buys, owns, and is beneficiary of a policy on each other owner
  • Survivor collects death benefit and pays estate directly for the interest; survivor’s cost basis rises by amount paid
  • Weakness: premium burden falls disproportionately on younger/minority owners (insuring an older owner costs more)
  • Weakness: policy count = n×(n−1) — 2 owners need 2 policies, 5 owners need 20

Entity Purchase Method

  • Business itself owns one policy per owner, pays all premiums, and is beneficiary
  • Company uses proceeds to redeem deceased’s interest (called stock redemption in a corporation)
  • Survivor’s percentage automatically rises since interest is retired, not purchased
  • Only needs one policy per owner (scales better for larger ownership groups)
  • If owner is also employee, employer-owned policy tax rules (IRC 101(j)) also apply

Valuation Gap & Legal Points

  • Fixed policy amount can fall short if business value grows — agreement/coverage should be reviewed at least annually
  • Michigan requires insured’s written consent (signature on application suffices) for policies ≥$10,000 (MCL 500.2211)
  • Changing structures (cross purchase ↔ entity) requires policy transfers; transfer-for-value can make death benefit taxable unless a statutory exception applies (IRC 101(a)(2))
  • Attorney drafts the buy-sell contract; producer only supplies the policy/premium

Key Person Coverage

  • Business owns policy, pays premium, and is beneficiary to protect against loss of a revenue-critical employee
  • Amount typically = lost profit during replacement period + replacement/training costs
  • Michigan requires insurable interest plus written consent from insured employee; nonmanagement/retired employee coverage limited to amount tied to unfunded benefit plan liabilities (MCL 500.2210(2))
  • Federal tax-free treatment (IRC 101(j)) requires advance written notice/consent before issuance, plus insured must meet an exception (e.g., recent employee, director, highly compensated, or proceeds benefit insured’s family/equity purchase)

Split Dollar vs. Executive Bonus

  • Split dollar: employer owns policy, pays annual increase in cash value; employee pays remainder and names beneficiary; employer recovers its paid-in amount at death/plan end, employee/beneficiary gets the rest
  • Employer’s risk is low since cash value always covers its recovery amount; good for low-cost early coverage to employee
  • Executive bonus: employer pays bonus equal to premium (taxable income to executive); executive owns policy outright and names beneficiary; employer has no claim on proceeds
  • Tax treatment of employee’s share in split dollar depends on plan documentation — referred to tax adviser, not quoted by producer

More from Life Insurance in Practice

  • Insurers, Financial Strength and the Insurance Contract Applied
  • Term, Whole Life and Endowment Policies in Practice
  • Universal Life and Variable Life Mechanics
  • Annuities in Practice
  • Premiums, Payment Modes and Dividends