-substitution is essentially the reverse chain rule - use this when one part of the function is inside another, and its derivative (or something close to the derivative) is also present. By temporarily using a new variable and simplifying the integral, integration rules can be applied more easily.
Pick the inner function - look for something nested or a function whose derivative also appears elsewhere. Don’t use , since that’s just a letter change.
Take the derivative
and rearrange so that
Substitute and into the integral. There should be no anywhere.
Use the integration rules from the previous section.
If it’s an indefinite integral, don’t forget the .
There’s an inner function nested in the cosine, so let’s try
Then
which appears in the integral so rewriting the integral in terms of ,
There’s a nested again. Let’s try
Then
However, since only appears in the integrand, let’s adjust by dividing by , so that
Then rewriting the integral in terms of ,
Let’s try
Then
Notice that can be factored out such that
And since appears in the integrand, then
Rewriting the integral in terms of ,
This involves a quotient but setting in the denominator won’t get us anywhere. However, because the derivative of is which does appear in the integrand, let’s set to be the entire nested function
Then the integral rewritten in terms of is
There’s a nested function , but recall that the derivative of is . Since a function and its derivative appear in the integrand, it would be better to choose
then
Rearranging,
The integral rewritten is
Alternatively, this substitution also works:
Then
And the integral rewritten is again
But the final answer when replacing with is
The reason both are correct is because of the Pythagorean identity , where the two functions differ only by a constant.
As a bonus problem, turn the integrand into a function involving only and before making an appropriate -substitution.
Here’s an interesting one that involves applying an additional technique during the -substitution.
There’s a nested function , so let’s try
Then
But how do we take care of the outside the square root?
What we can do is rearrange the chosen by adding to both sides so that
Then the integral rewritten in terms of is
Distribute to get
Then using the reverse power rule, the integral is
Let
Notice that in the numerator, can be broken apart into . Rearrange the chosen to get
Rearrange to get
Which means
Then the integral rewritten in terms of is
If you’re using -substitution on a definite integral, there are two options to evaluate it using the FTC part 2:
Option 1: Change the bounds
Change the limits from to so that the antiderivative does not need to be changed back to a function in terms of .
Option 2: Don’t change the bounds.
Plug back into and evaluate the result with the original bounds.
Calculations are often a little easier if the constant multiple is brought out first.
is the denominator, but if we let , then which is more complicated than what appears in the numerator. Instead, try
Then
In order to get , divide by .
At this point, we have two options:
Option 1: Change the bounds
When (the lower bound),
When (the upper bound),
Then the integral rewritten in terms of is
Option 2: Don’t change the bounds
Use the same substitution to rewrite the integral in terms of , but keep the original bounds of to :
After integrating to this step, change back to and evaluate from to
Sign up for free to take 10 quiz questions on this topic