u-substitution
-substitution is essentially the reverse chain rule. You use it when one function is nested inside another, and the derivative of the inner function (or something close to it) also appears in the integrand. By temporarily switching to a new variable, you can simplify the integral and apply basic integration rules more directly.
Steps for -substitution
- Choose .
Pick the “inner” function. Look for something nested, or an expression whose derivative shows up elsewhere in the integrand. Avoid choosing , since that doesn’t simplify anything.
- Differentiate
Differentiate with respect to :
Then rewrite it in differential form:
- Rewrite the integral
Substitute and into the integral. After this step, there should be no left in the integrand.
- Integrate with respect to .
Apply the usual integration rules, treating as the variable.
- Plug back in.
For an indefinite integral, include the constant of integration .
Examples
Solution
The expression is inside the cosine, so choose
Differentiate:
That matches the in the integral, so rewrite in terms of :
Solution
Again, is nested, so let
Then
But the integrand has only . Divide by :
Now rewrite the integral:
Solution
Let
Differentiate:
Factor out :
Solve for :
Rewrite the integral:
Solution
This is a quotient, but choosing won’t help. Instead, notice that , which appears in the integrand. Choose the nested expression:
Then
Rewrite the integral:
Solution
The integrand contains a function and its derivative pattern: the derivative of is . Because the angle is , choose
Differentiate:
Solve for :
Rewrite and integrate:
Alternatively, this substitution also works:
Then
And the integral rewritten is again
But the final answer when replacing with is
Both answers are correct because of the Pythagorean identity . The two antiderivatives differ only by a constant.
As a bonus problem, turn the integrand into a function involving only and before making an appropriate -substitution.
Extra technique
Here’s a useful variation: sometimes you’ll do a small algebra step after choosing so you can rewrite everything in terms of .
Solution
The nested expression is , so let
Then
The remaining issue is the outside the square root. Rewrite in terms of by solving for :
Now rewrite the integral:
Distribute :
Integrate term-by-term:
Solution
Let
The numerator can be split as . Rewrite each part in terms of .
From :
From :
So
Now rewrite and simplify:
Definite integrals and changing bounds
When you use -substitution on a definite integral, you have two standard ways to finish the problem.
Option 1: Change the bounds
Convert the limits from -values to -values. Then you can evaluate the antiderivative in terms of without converting back to .
Option 2: Don’t change the bounds.
Convert back to after integrating, and then evaluate using the original -bounds.
Examples
Calculations are often simpler if you factor out constants first:
The denominator is . If you choose , then becomes more complicated than what appears in the numerator. Instead, choose the inner expression:
Then
Solve for :
At this point, you can finish in either of two ways.
Option 1: Change the bounds
When (the lower bound),
When (the upper bound),
Rewrite the integral with -bounds:
Option 2: Don’t change the bounds
Rewrite in terms of , but keep the original -bounds:
Integrate, then substitute back in before evaluating from to :