Fundamental theorem of calculus
In a previous section, you saw that derivatives and integrals are opposite processes. If
then
Because integration can “undo” differentiation, when you’re given a function you can look for an antiderivative: a function whose derivative is .
That idea leads to Part 2 of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which gives a practical way to compute definite integrals using antiderivatives.
To evaluate a definite integral:
- Find an antiderivative of .
- Compute .
The vertical bar in means “evaluate at and subtract the value at .” It’s a common intermediate step when working with definite integrals.
Now the key question is: how do you find antiderivatives?
Just like with derivatives, there are rules you can use. One of the most important is the reverse power rule.
Reverse power rule
Recall the power rule for derivatives:
To reverse this process for integrals, add 1 to the exponent and divide by the new exponent:
This rule requires (otherwise you’d divide by ). For now, we’ll avoid that case. The meaning of the and additional antiderivative rules are covered in the next section.
Examples
Evaluate
Solution
Graphically, the region under from to is a trapezoid. The width is , and the parallel sides have lengths and . So we should expect the trapezoid’s area:
Now compute the same value using the FTC.
First, rewrite with explicit exponents so it’s clear how to apply the reverse power rule:
Apply the reverse power rule term-by-term to find an antiderivative :
Now apply the FTC:
Evaluate
Rewrite so the exponents are explicit:
Use the reverse power rule:
Now apply the FTC:
Let be the function whose graph is given below and let be an antiderivative of .
a) If , find .
b) Find .
Solutions
a) Find given .
Because is an antiderivative of , the FTC gives
Solve for :
Now compute the definite integral by finding the net area under the graph from to . The region consists of:
- A trapezoid on interval with area
- A trapezoid on interval with area
So
Then
b) Find .
Since is an antiderivative of , we have .
So . From the graph, .
The table below gives values of a function at selected points:
Suppose that is an antiderivative of such that . Use a right Riemann sum with the values in the table to estimate .
Because is an antiderivative of , the FTC gives
Solve for :
We can’t compute exactly from the table, so we estimate it using a right Riemann sum on the subintervals determined by the given -values.
It may help to plot the points and draw the rectangles. Here is how it looks:
Using right endpoints:
- On , the right endpoint is , so the height is and the width is . Area: .
- On , the right endpoint is , so the height is and the width is . Area: .
So the right Riemann sum is , giving the estimate
Then
Here’s a problem that appeared on the multiple-choice question portion of the 1998 AB exam (#11):
If is a linear function and , then
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Solution
Apply the FTC to :
If is linear, then
Differentiate:
So and , which means
The correct answer choice is

