An infinite limit occurs when a function approaches as the input () approaches a finite value. When the limit
it typically indicates the function is getting close to a vertical asymptote. Most of the problems you’ll encounter will involve rational functions and evaluating one-sided limits, although trigonometric functions may also appear.
1. Evaluate
Direct substitution results in , which is not an indeterminate form and suggests a vertical asymptote at .
To determine if the graph increases or decreases without bound as from either side, let’s reason through what would happen when input values of are slightly smaller than (approaching from the left).
would become divided by a negative number very close to 0, and overall becomes a very negative number. This is confirmed by a table of values:
As , quickly becomes smaller and smaller. So we can estimate that
On the other hand, inputting a value of that is slightly larger than results in over a very small positive number, and the overall value of is overwhelmingly large. Then
So the overall limit does not exist.
2. Find the vertical asymptotes of
Answer:
This function is undefined when the denominator .
However, directly substituting into the function results in . This indeterminate form means is not a vertical asymptote. In fact, by taking the limit
we see that the function approaches as approaches . is still undefined but there is a hole at rather than an asymptote.
Direct substitution of results in which means is a vertical asymptote. In fact, the graph in this problem looks exactly like the one from the first example, , except with a hole at .
On the other hand, limits at infinity describe what happens to as the input () approaches . These often reveal horizontal asymptotes, or the long-range/end behavior of the function.
If the limit approaches as becomes arbitrarily large or small, then is a horizontal asymptote.
A horizontal asymptote of is described by:
If a problem requires you to find , the shortcut is to compare the highest degrees in the numerator and denominator and identify which of these three cases it fits:
This technique of identifying the highest degrees is called dominant term analysis because when is very large or small, the term with the highest power “dominates” and lower-power terms become negligible in comparison. Rational expressions with limits at infinity can be simplified to their highest degrees; for example,
1. Evaluate
Although not written in standard form, the polynomial in the denominator is a 4th degree one, while the one in the numerator is 3rd degree.
Using dominant term analysis, the limit simplifies to
This is a case 1 situation. Graph the rational function to see that as gets smaller and smaller, the function starts getting closer and closer to the horizontal asymptote of .
2. Evaluate
Combine the expression into a single rational function:
This fits case 2, where the limit is just the ratio of the coefficients .
Another way to reason through this problem’s original form () is to consider what happens when becomes arbitrarily large - the bigger the number on the bottom, the smaller the fraction becomes overall. If is very large, the function becomes so close to that the effectively doesn’t contribute anything.
3. Evaluate
The top is a 4th degree polynomial while the bottom is a 3rd degree one, which fits case 3. With dominant term analysis, the limit simplifies to
Another common type of question involves square roots. For limits at infinity, the general method is to factor out the highest power of in the square root.
Let
Evaluate:
a)
b)
a)
Answer:
Direct substitution results in the indeterminate form .
In the square root, is the highest power. Factor that out:
Separate the radical:
The next step is important:
and not just . Because no matter what value of (positive or negative) is put into , the output will be positive, which is what the absolute value function does. Then the limit becomes
What do we do with limits involving absolute values? Use piecewise functions.
Since and the piece defined for all is , the limit becomes
must be fully factored in the denominator before canceling:
As becomes very large, both and effectively become (negligible). Then the limit is
b)
Answer:
The process to resolve this is the same as it was in part (a), up to this step:
This time, and the piece defined for all is , so the limit becomes
Follow the same process as above (factoring out and simplifying some of the terms) and the limit this time is .
Graph in Desmos to confirm visually!
Not all problems involving limits at infinity are rational functions. For example, to evaluate
First use conjugates to rewrite the expression in rational form.
Answer: 2
Direct substitution results in the indeterminate form
(which is ). Then
Then follow a similar process to the previous example, factoring out the highest power of in the square root.
As a challenge problem, find
instead. The answer is, interestingly, .
Hint:
While might as well be treated as for very negative values of , think of whether it’s actually a very small positive or negative number and what that contributes to the limit expression!
Sign up for free to take 9 quiz questions on this topic