Limits and infinity
Infinite limits & vertical asymptotes
An infinite limit happens when a function grows without bound (toward or ) as the input approaches a finite number.
We write this as
When you see an infinite limit, it usually means the graph is approaching a vertical asymptote. Many problems involve rational functions and one-sided limits, although trigonometric functions can also produce infinite limits.
Examples
- Evaluate
Solution
Direct substitution gives . That’s not an indeterminate form, and it tells us the function is undefined at (a vertical asymptote).
To decide whether the function goes to or , look at the sign of the denominator on each side of .
Approaching from the left (), the denominator is a small negative number, so is a large negative number. A table confirms this:
- From the left:
As , decreases without bound, so
- From the right:
Approaching from the right (), the denominator is a small positive number, so is a large positive number. Therefore,
Because the one-sided limits are different, the two-sided limit does not exist.
- Find the vertical asymptotes of
Solution
Answer:
A rational function is undefined where its denominator is , so start by solving
Now check what happens at each value.
- At , substituting into the original function gives , which is indeterminate. That usually means a factor cancels, creating a hole rather than a vertical asymptote.
Compute the limit by factoring and canceling:
So the function approaches as . The value is still undefined, but the graph has a hole at , not an asymptote.
- At , substituting gives , which indicates a vertical asymptote.
So the only vertical asymptote is . The graph behaves like , except it also has a hole at .
Limits at infinity & horizontal asymptotes
Limits at infinity describe what happens to as becomes very large in the positive or negative direction (as ). These limits often reveal horizontal asymptotes, which describe the long-range behavior of the function.
If the limit approaches a finite number , then is a horizontal asymptote.
A horizontal asymptote is described by
For limits of rational functions as , a quick method is to compare the highest powers (degrees) in the numerator and denominator. There are three cases:
This “compare the degrees” approach is called dominant term analysis. The idea is that when is very large, the highest-power terms dominate the behavior, and lower-power terms become negligible.
For example,
Examples
- Evaluate
Solution
Rewrite the denominator mentally in standard form: the highest power present is , so the denominator has degree . The numerator has degree .
Since top degree bottom degree, this is case 1, so the limit should be . Using dominant terms:
This matches the horizontal asymptote .
- Evaluate
Solution
As , the fraction , so the whole expression approaches .
If you want to see it using a single rational expression:
This fits case 2: equal degrees, so the limit is the ratio of leading coefficients .
- Evaluate
Solution
The numerator has degree and the denominator has degree , so this is case 3. Use dominant terms:
Square roots
Another common situation is a limit at infinity that includes square roots. A reliable strategy is:
- Rewrite the expression so you can factor out the highest power of inside the radical.
- Be careful with : it equals , not .
Let
Evaluate:
a)
b)
Solutions
a)
Answer:
Direct substitution gives the indeterminate form .
Inside the square root, the highest power is . Factor it out:
Separate the radical:
The next step is important:
(not just ). So
To handle , use the fact that for , we have . Then
Factor from the denominator before canceling:
As , both and , so
b)
Answer:
The algebra is the same as in part (a) up to the point where becomes :
Now , so . Substitute that piece:
Continue by factoring out in the denominator and simplifying as before. The limit evaluates to .
Graph in Desmos to confirm visually!
Not all limits at infinity are rational functions. For example, to evaluate
start by using the conjugate to rewrite the expression as a rational expression.
Solution
Answer: 2
Direct substitution gives the indeterminate form (which is not ). Multiply by the conjugate:
Now factor out the highest power of inside the square root:
As , , so
As a challenge problem, find
instead. The answer is, interestingly, .
Hint:
While is close to for very negative , it’s still a small negative number. Think about how that affects the expression inside the square root and the overall subtraction.