Achievable logoAchievable logo
AP Calculus AB
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
Introduction
1. Limits
1.1 Tables and graphs
1.2 Analytical limits
1.3 Advanced algebraic limits
1.4 Limits and infinity
1.5 Special limits
1.6 Continuity
2. Derivative basics
3. Advanced differentiation
4. Contextual uses
5. Analytical uses
6. Integration
7. Differential equations
8. Applications of integrals
9. Testing details tag
10. test
Wrapping up
Achievable logoAchievable logo
1.4 Limits and infinity
Achievable AP Calculus AB
1. Limits
Our AP Calculus AB course is currently in development and is a work-in-progress.

Limits and infinity

11 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

What you’ll learn:

  • How to evaluate limits approaching vertical asymptotes (infinite limits)
  • Evaluate limits at infinity (horizontal asymptotes)
  • Dominant term analysis for rational functions
  • Handling limits at infinity involving square roots

Infinite limits & vertical asymptotes

An infinite limit occurs when a function approaches ±∞ as the input (x) approaches a finite value. When the limit

x→alim​f(x)=+∞

 or 

x→alim​f(x)=−∞

it typically indicates the function is getting close to a vertical asymptote. Most of the problems you’ll encounter will involve rational functions and evaluating one-sided limits, although trigonometric functions may also appear.

Sidenote
Constant over zero

If direct substitution in a limit problem results in a non-zero constant over a denominator of zero, this is not indeterminate - instead, it signals a vertical asymptote at x=a.

Examples

1. Evaluate

x→2lim​x−21​

Solution

Direct substitution results in 01​, which is not an indeterminate form and suggests a vertical asymptote at x=2.

To determine if the graph increases or decreases without bound as x→2 from either side, let’s reason through what would happen when input values of x are slightly smaller than 2 (approaching from the left).

f(x) would become 1 divided by a negative number very close to 0, and overall f(x) becomes a very negative number. This is confirmed by a table of values:

x f(x)
1.9 −10
1.99 −100
1.999 −1000
1.9999 −10000
  • From the left:

As x→2−, f(x) quickly becomes smaller and smaller. So we can estimate that

x→2−lim​x−21​=−∞

  • From the right:

On the other hand, inputting a value of x that is slightly larger than 2 results in 1 over a very small positive number, and the overall value of f(x) is overwhelmingly large. Then

x→2+lim​x−21​=+∞

So the overall limit does not exist.

2. Find the vertical asymptotes of y=x2−3x+2x−1​

Solution

(spoiler)

Answer: x=2 only​

This function is undefined when the denominator =0.

x2−3x+2=0(x−1)(x−2)=0x=1,2

However, directly substituting x=1 into the function results in 00​. This indeterminate form means x=1 is not a vertical asymptote. In fact, by taking the limit

x→1lim​x2−3x+2x−1​

=x→1lim​Factor & cancel(x−1)​(x−2)​​(x−1)​​

=x→1lim​x−21​

=−1

we see that the function approaches −1 as x approaches 1. f(1) is still undefined but there is a hole at x=1 rather than an asymptote.

Direct substitution of x=2 results in 01​ which means x=2 is a vertical asymptote. In fact, the graph in this problem looks exactly like the one from the first example, f(x)=x−21​, except with a hole at x=1.

Limits at infinity & horizontal asymptotes

On the other hand, limits at infinity describe what happens to f(x) as the input (x) approaches ±∞. These often reveal horizontal asymptotes, or the long-range/end behavior of the function.

If the limit approaches L as x becomes arbitrarily large or small, then y=L is a horizontal asymptote.

A horizontal asymptote of f(x) is described by:

x→+∞lim​f(x)=L

 or 

x→−∞lim​f(x)=L

If a problem requires you to find x→±∞lim​(some rational function), the shortcut is to compare the highest degrees in the numerator and denominator and identify which of these three cases it fits:

Case 1: Degree of top < bottom: H.A.=0

  • e.g. x→∞lim​x4+1x2−1​=0

Case 2: Degree of top = bottom: H.A.= ratio of leading coefficients

  • e.g. x→∞lim​3x2−22x2+1​=32​

Case 3: Degree of top > bottom: H.A.=+∞ or −∞

  • e.g. x→∞lim​2x+1x3−1​=∞

This technique of identifying the highest degrees is called dominant term analysis because when x is very large or small, the term with the highest power “dominates” and lower-power terms become negligible in comparison. Rational expressions with limits at infinity can be simplified to their highest degrees; for example,

x→∞lim​2x+1x3−x​

​≈x→∞lim​2xx3​=x→∞lim​2x2​=∞ (DNE)​

Sidenote
About case 3:

Dominant term analysis is most relevant for case 3. The limit can be +∞ or −∞ depending on what the expression simplifies to.

Examples

1. Evaluate

x→−∞lim​3x2−2x+x4+1−x3+x−1​

Solution

Although not written in standard form, the polynomial in the denominator is a 4th degree one, while the one in the numerator is 3rd degree.

Using dominant term analysis, the limit simplifies to

≈x→−∞lim​x4−x3​

=x→−∞lim​−x1​

=0​

This is a case 1 situation. Graph the rational function to see that as x gets smaller and smaller, the function starts getting closer and closer to the horizontal asymptote of y=0.

2. Evaluate

x→∞lim​(−5+x21​)

Solution

Combine the expression into a single rational function:

x→∞lim​(x2−5x2​+x21​)

=x→∞lim​x2−5x2+1​

≈x→∞lim​x2−5x2​

=−5​

This fits case 2, where the limit is just the ratio of the coefficients 1−5​.

Another way to reason through this problem’s original form (−5+x21​) is to consider what happens when x becomes arbitrarily large - the bigger the number on the bottom, the smaller the fraction becomes overall. If x is very large, the function becomes so close to 0 that the x21​ effectively doesn’t contribute anything.

3. Evaluate

x→−∞lim​−5x3−x−2x4+x−1​

Solution

The top is a 4th degree polynomial while the bottom is a 3rd degree one, which fits case 3. With dominant term analysis, the limit simplifies to

≈x→−∞lim​−5x3−2x4​

=x→−∞lim​52x​

=−∞ (DNE)​

Square roots

Another common type of question involves square roots. For limits at infinity, the general method is to factor out the highest power of x in the square root.

Let

f(x)=3+x2​−3​x​

Evaluate:

a) x→∞lim​f(x)
b) x→−∞lim​f(x)

Solutions

a) x→∞lim​f(x)

(spoiler)

Answer: 1​

Direct substitution results in the indeterminate form ∞∞​.

In the square root, x2 is the highest power. Factor that out:

x→∞lim​x2(x23​+1)​−3​x​

Separate the radical:

x→∞lim​(x2​⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

The next step is important:

x2​=∣x∣ and not just x. Because no matter what value of x (positive or negative) is put into x2​, the output will be positive, which is what the absolute value function does. Then the limit becomes

x→∞lim​(∣x∣⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

What do we do with limits involving absolute values? Use piecewise functions.

Since x→∞ and the piece defined for all x>0 is +x, the limit becomes

x→∞lim​(+x⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

x must be fully factored in the denominator before canceling:

x→∞lim​x​⋅(x23​+1​−x3​​)x​​

=x→∞lim​x23​+1​−x3​​1​

As x becomes very large, both x23​ and x3​​ effectively become 0 (negligible). Then the limit is

≈x→∞lim​0+1​−01​=1​

b) x→−∞lim​f(x)

(spoiler)

Answer: −1​

The process to resolve this is the same as it was in part (a), up to this step:

x→∞lim​(∣x∣⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

This time, x→−∞ and the piece defined for all x<0 is −x, so the limit becomes

x→∞lim​(−x⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

Follow the same process as above (factoring out x and simplifying some of the terms) and the limit this time is −1​.

Graph f(x) in Desmos to confirm visually!

Not all problems involving limits at infinity are rational functions. For example, to evaluate

x→∞lim​(x2+4x​−x)

First use conjugates to rewrite the expression in rational form.

Solution

(spoiler)

Answer: 2

Direct substitution results in the indeterminate form
∞−∞ (which is =0). Then

x→∞lim​(x2+4x​−x)⋅Multiplied by conjugatex2+4x​+xx2+4x​+x​​​

=x→∞lim​x2+4x​+x(x2+4x)−x2​

=x→∞lim​x2+4x​+x4x​

Then follow a similar process to the previous example, factoring out the highest power of x in the square root.

x→∞lim​x2(1+x4​)​+x4x​

=x→∞lim​(x⋅1+x4​​)+x4x​

=x→∞lim​x​⋅(1+x4​​+1)4x​​

≈x→∞lim​1+0​+14​=2​

As a challenge problem, find

x→−∞lim​(x2+4x​−x)

instead. The answer is, interestingly, +∞.

Hint:

(spoiler)

While x4​ might as well be treated as 0 for very negative values of x, think of whether it’s actually a very small positive or negative number and what that contributes to the limit expression!

Key points
  • Infinite limits occur when f(x)→±∞ as x→finite #

    • Expressed as x→alim​f(x)=±∞

    • Typically indicates that x=a is a vertical asymptote.

  • Limits at infinity are about what f(x) does as x→±∞

    • Expressed as x→±∞lim​f(x)=L.

    • If L is finite, then y=L is a horizontal asymptote.

    • If L=±∞, there is no horizontal asymptote (f(x) rises or falls forever).

  • Use the 3 cases (dominant term analysis) as a shortcut to determine horizontal asymptotes of rational functions.

  • For limits at infinity with square roots, turn into a rational expression with conjugates and then factor out the highest power of x in the square root.

Sign up for free to take 9 quiz questions on this topic

All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.