Advanced algebraic limits
Indeterminate forms
In the previous section, we found limits by substituting the value of into the function. Sometimes, though, direct substitution produces an undefined or unhelpful expression like . This is called an indeterminate form. It doesn’t mean the limit doesn’t exist - it means we can’t determine the limit from substitution alone.
There are only 7 indeterminate forms:
To resolve these, you’ll usually rewrite the expression using algebraic techniques - such as factoring, rationalizing, or combining terms with common denominators - and then try substitution again.
Factoring
Many limits simplify after factoring. The main idea is to rewrite the expression so you can cancel the factor that creates the “problem area,” turning an indeterminate form into something you can evaluate.
Example
Evaluate
Solution
Start with direct substitution:
This is an indeterminate form.
Now factor the numerator and denominator.
- Numerator: difference of squares
- Denominator: factor out the GCF, then factor the remaining sum of cubes
The expression matches the sum of cubes pattern . To use the formula, identify and :
Let so . Let so .
Factoring gives:
Factoring:
Substitute that into the limit and cancel the common factor:
Rationalization with conjugates
This technique is especially useful when square roots lead to an indeterminate form after substitution. The idea is to multiply by a conjugate so the square root expression simplifies using a difference of squares.
For example, the conjugate of is . Multiplying them gives a difference of squares:
Example
Evaluate
Solution
Start with direct substitution:
This is an indeterminate form.
Because the numerator contains a square root, multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of , which is :
Now use the difference of squares in the numerator:
Rewrite as so it cancels with the denominator:
Now substitute :
Here is an alternative method for the same problem that uses factoring:
Recognize that is a difference of squares:
Then
Notice that , so you can cancel:
Combining with common denominators
When you see a “fraction over a fraction,” it often helps to combine terms using a common denominator first.
Example
Evaluate
Solution
Direct substitution gives the indeterminate form . To combine the two fractions in the numerator, use the common denominator .
Now rewrite the complex fraction as multiplication by the reciprocal:
Rewrite as so the factor cancels:
Absolute value functions
To find , direct substitution works and the limit is . But absolute values can create indeterminate forms when the expression inside the bars becomes .
For example, suppose
and you want to find . Direct substitution gives .
To resolve this, rewrite the absolute value as a piecewise function. Then evaluate the one-sided limits separately.
Recall the definition of absolute value:
To rewrite an absolute value expression as a piecewise function, first find the breakpoint(s) - the value(s) of that make the expression inside the bars equal to .
Rewrite as a piecewise function.
The expression inside the bars is , which equals when . To decide which piece applies on each side of , test a point in each region.
So written as a piecewise function is:
And written in piecewise form is
To find , evaluate the one-sided limits.
- Left:
- Right:
Since the one-sided limits don’t match, does not exist.
Challenge problems
- Evaluate
Solution
Direct substitution gives . Factoring works here, but the key is to factor the denominator as a difference of cubes.
Assign and , so:
Then
Now cancel the common factor:
Note that the conjugate method doesn’t help with cube roots here, because , which still leads to an indeterminate form.
- Evaluate
Solution
Direct substitution gives . The breakpoints come from setting each expression inside absolute value bars equal to :
These break the number line into 3 regions:
Since we only need the limit as , we focus on the interval . Test a point in that interval, such as :
- is negative, so
- is positive, so
Rewrite the expression using those pieces:
Simplify: