Pronouns are essential for avoiding repetition in sentences, but their use can sometimes lead to confusion. This module focuses on understanding pronouns, using them properly, and resolving ambiguity by replacing unclear pronouns with specific nouns. The determination of which pronoun is correct often comes down to whether its antecedent is singular or plural. (Remember that the antecedent is the noun that is replaced and referred to by the pronoun.)
Should you leave the sentence below as it is or opt for one of the three alternatives listed in the answer choices?
The lemur is distinguished from other primates by its wet and hairless nose.
A. NO CHANGE
B. it’s
C. they’re
D. their
The differences here are classics of classroom confusion: is it “its” or “it’s”? Is it “their” or “they’re”? One way to wrap both of these ideas together is to observe that possessive pronouns do not have an apostrophe. So “its” and “their” must be the pronouns meaning “belonging to it” and “belonging to them,” respectively.
This rule helps you recognize that “it’s” and “they’re” are both contractions of two words; neither one can be the answer here. The only remaining question is, Do we want a singular or plural pronoun? The question is harder than it may seem given that “lemur” is a collective noun: it points to a plural idea (all lemurs) but is grammatically singular.
Since it is singular, “its” is the best choice. The answer is **NO CHANGE"".
Try this question now.
Should you leave the sentence below as it is or opt for one of the three alternatives listed in the answer choices?
Although Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican elected president, it was John C. Fremont which, in 1856, had the honor of being the first Republican presidential candidate.
A. NO CHANGE
B. whom
C. to whom
D. who
Since this question asks us to distinguish between “who” and “whom”, this is a good place to insert the note that we can test the difference by inserting “he” for “who” and “him” for “whom”. In other words, in this sentence, should we say “he had the honor …” or “him had the honor …” It’s clearly the first, so we can eliminate “whom”. We can also eliminate “which” because we are talking about a person; we use “who” for people and “which” for things. And if “which” is out, then certainly “to which” is out; there’s no reason for the “to” in the syntax of this sentence. The answer is D.
Try this question now.
Should you leave the sentence below as it is or opt for one of the three alternatives listed in the answer choices?
Alexander Solzhenitsyn criticized the regime Josef Stalin and, for this reason, Stalin sentenced himself to eight years in the Russian prison system known as the gulag.
A. NO CHANGE
B. him
C. one
D. them
It would be mighty interesting if Stalin sentenced himself to prison! This is clearly not the time for the reflexive pronoun. We can’t use “them” because only one person is being sent to prison, and “one” only works when the sentence is speaking about a generic person without naming a name. (If “one” is the right answer on the CLT, typically “one” will appear someone else in the sentence as well.)
The most natural rendering is that Stalin sentenced “him” to prison. The answer is B.
Try this question now.
Should you leave the sentence below as it is or opt for one of the three alternatives listed in the answer choices?
Because pronouns can help a sentence flow more cleanly, they should use them frequently.
A. NO CHANGE
B. she
C. them
D. students
This is an example of pronoun vagueness. Who, exactly, is the “they” who should use pronouns frequently? From the original sentence, we can’t tell. In a case like this, the right answer will replace the vague pronoun with something specific. No pronoun will do; “she” isn’t any better, and “them” is even worse because it’s an object form when we need a subject form. The concrete “students” works well; the answer is D.
Sign up for free to take 5 quiz questions on this topic