This section will apply the DIRECT Method to a CLT Modern/Influential Thinkers passage. As the name implies, this Grammar & Writing passage will feature language familiar to the modern reader. The content is often similar to that found in the Philosophy/Religion passage but typically from a more modern point of view–in some cases, directly addressing an issue of ongoing significance to today’s world.
In this section, you’ll find part of an encyclical from Pope John Paul II, Centesimus Annus, found in the Vatican’s online library. After each paragraph, you’ll find questions tied to the underlined portions in the paragraph. This format does not exactly mimic the format of the CLT, where the entire passage appears on the left and the questions on the right, so be sure to practice with official CLT materials as well.
1. century the
A. NO CHANGE
B. century, the
C. century; the
D. century. The
The answer is B. “Towards the end of the last century” is an introductory phrase–something that can’t stand on its own as a sentence but that introduces the main body of the sentence. Introductory phrases should be followed by a comma. We can confirm this understanding by noting that choices C and D are impossible because the punctuation is not separating two independent clauses (remember the Clause Test). Choice A would result in too many phrases and clauses piled on top of each other without a pause or break in the wording.
2. The way this whole thing came about
A. NO CHANGE
B. The predisposing antecedent for such a modus operandi
C. The determining factor in this process
D. The cause of this stuff
The answer is C. This is a tone/style question, meaning that we need to match the appropriate style of wording (formal or informal) and the general phrasing with what we’ve seen from the author. It’s a good idea in these cases to read the entire paragraph to a get a sense of how the author writes. We might say that John Paul II writes formally but not stiffly, with clear phrasing. We should be able to look at the choices and disallow those that don’t sound like they could fit in this paragraph.
Usually one of the wrong answers to a tone/style question has so many big words that it sounds quite awkward; choice B is that example here, so we can eliminate it. But the other two wrong answers are on the other extreme; they sound too casual for this writer. Certainly, choice D would not fit well in this author’s mouth, and choice A also sounds a bit too conversational when compared with the right answer. Words like “factor” and “process” fit well in this context.
3. servitude
A. NO CHANGE
B. salvation
C. servant-heartedness
D. salutation
The answer is A. Which word fits best in this sentence? We need to follow the tone as John Paul II talks about a new society with its contrasts. On the one hand, it brought “new freedoms,” but the end of the sentence is clearly relating some disadvantages to the new society, as shown in the ominous word “threat”. The fact that “injustice” is connected by “and” to the underlined portion tells us we’re looking for a similar word, so choices B and C can be seen as too positive in tone for this answer. A “salutation”, although it comes from the Latin for “salvation”, is just a greeting in modern parlance; nothing negative about that! Servitude, a word that points to a forced status of bondage and abasement, is the word we’re looking for here.
4. progressive
A. NO CHANGE
B. progression
C. progress
D. progressively
The answer is D. Among our choices for this part of speech question, choice A offers an adjective, choice B a noun, choice C also a noun (or possibly a verb), and choice D an adverb. The underlined word modifies “taken shape,” which is a verbal form. Adverbs are what we want when a verb is modified: the “ly” word is the one!
5. lack
A. NO CHANGE
B. lacks
C. lacked
D. will lack
The answer is C. This is a long sentence with many parts and multiple verbs. Earlier in the sentence we find the verb form “had appeared”, but there is no “had lacked” for us to choose here. A better clue is the verb that follows the idea of lacking: “were determined.” That part of the sentence is connected to this part with an “and”, so we have parallel structure. This means we should make our form of “lack” consistent with “were determined”. It appears, then, that we need a past tense form, and choice C is our only option for that.
Sign up for free to take 5 quiz questions on this topic