This browser is too old to run Achievable.

Update it, or open this page in a current version of Chrome, Safari, Firefox or Edge. On an iPhone or iPad, update iOS: every browser there runs on the version of Safari that comes with it.

Achievable logoAchievable logo
CLT
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Resources
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
Introduction
1. Quantitative Reasoning
2. Verbal Reasoning
3. Grammar & Writing
3.1 Intro and Passage Types
3.1.1 The DIRECT Method
3.1.2 Philosophy/Religion Passage
3.1.3 Historical Profile Passage
3.1.4 Science Passage
3.1.5 Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage
3.2 Question Types
Wrapping Up
Achievable logoAchievable logo
3.1.5 Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage
Achievable CLT
3. Grammar & Writing
3.1. Intro and Passage Types

Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage

8 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

Introduction

This section will apply the DIRECT Method to a CLT Modern/Influential Thinkers passage. As the name implies, this Grammar & Writing passage will feature language familiar to the modern reader. The content is often similar to that found in the Philosophy/Religion passage but typically from a more modern point of view–in some cases, directly addressing an issue of ongoing significance to today’s world.

DIRECT to the Source: The Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage

In this section, you’ll find part of an encyclical from Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum (1891), in the translation printed in The Great Encyclical Letters of Pope Leo XIII (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1903), found in the Internet Archive. After each paragraph, you’ll find questions tied to the underlined portions in the paragraph. This format does not exactly mimic the format of the CLT, where the entire passage appears on the left and the questions on the right, so be sure to practice with official CLT materials as well.

That the spirit of revolutionary change, which has long been disturbing the nations of the world, should have passed beyond the sphere of politics and made its influence felt in the cognate sphere of practical economics is not surprising. The elements of the conflict now raging are unmistakable in the vast expansion of industrial pursuits and the marvelous discoveries of [1] science, in the changed relations between masters and workmen; in the enormous fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the masses; in the increased self-reliance and closer mutual combination of the working classes; as also, finally, in the prevailing moral degeneracy. The momentous gravity of the state of things now obtaining fills every mind with painful [2] apprehension; [3] smart folks are chewing it over; practical men are proposing schemes; popular meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all busied with it—and actually there is no question which has taken a deeper hold on the public mind.

1. science, in

A. NO CHANGE
B. science; in
C. science: in
D. science. In

(spoiler)

The answer is B. This sentence lists the places where “the conflict now raging” shows itself, and some items in that list contain commas of their own: “in the enormous fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the masses.” When the items in a series contain commas, separate the items with semicolons, so the reader can see where each item ends. Leo puts a semicolon between all the other items, and this boundary should match. Choice A leaves a comma that blurs into the commas inside the items. Choice C is wrong because a colon announces that what follows explains or lists what came before, but “in the changed relations between masters and workmen” does neither; it is simply the next item in the same list, parallel to “in the vast expansion of industrial pursuits.” Choice D creates a fragment: “In the changed relations between masters and workmen” has no subject or verb of its own (remember the Clause Test).

2. apprehension

A. NO CHANGE
B. appeasement
C. approbation
D. appropriation

(spoiler)

The answer is A. This is a word choice question, and the four choices sound alike, so meaning has to decide it. The sentence says that the “momentous gravity” of the situation fills every mind with something “painful,” and the rest of the sentence shows people discussing the problem and proposing remedies. We need a word for worry about what is coming. That is “apprehension,” an anxious fear that something bad will happen. “Approbation” means approval, far too positive for a “painful” state of mind. “Appeasement,” calming someone by giving in to his demands, is an action, not a feeling that could fill a mind, and “appropriation,” the act of taking something for one’s own use, makes no sense here either.

3. smart folks are chewing it over

A. NO CHANGE
B. sagacious personages are engaged in protracted deliberations upon its manifold ramifications
C. wise men are discussing it
D. everybody with a brain is talking about it

(spoiler)

The answer is C. This is a tone/style question, so we need to match the wording to the way the author writes. Leo writes formally and with weight, in long, balanced sentences, but his words are plain and clear. Notice, too, that the underlined portion begins a series of parallel clauses: “___; practical men are proposing schemes; popular meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all busied with it.” The right answer should sound like its neighbors.

Choice B is the overstuffed answer that tone/style questions usually include; “sagacious personages” and “manifold ramifications” are far grander than anything around them. Choices A and D go to the other extreme: “chewing it over” and “everybody with a brain” are much too casual for this writer. Choice C has the same simple, dignified shape as “practical men are proposing schemes.”

… But all agree, and there can be no question whatever, that some remedy must be found, and found quickly, for the misery and wretchedness pressing so heavily and [4] unjust at this moment on the vast majority of the working classes.

4. unjust

A. NO CHANGE
B. injustice
C. unjustified
D. unjustly

(spoiler)

The answer is D. Among our choices for this part of speech question, choice A is an adjective, choice B a noun, choice C an adjective formed from a verb, and choice D an adverb. The underlined word tells how the misery is “pressing” on the working classes, and “pressing” is a verb form. A word that modifies a verb is an adverb. The word is also joined by “and” to “heavily,” another adverb, so the two should match: “pressing so heavily and unjustly.”

For the ancient workingmen’s guilds were abolished in the last century, and no other organization [5] takes their place. Public institutions and the very laws have set aside the ancient religion. Hence by degrees it has come to pass that workingmen have been surrendered, all isolated and helpless, to the hard-heartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition. … To this must be added the custom of working by contract, and the concentration of so many branches of trade in the hands of a few individuals, so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slavery itself.

5. takes

A. NO CHANGE
B. will take
C. took
D. is taking

(spoiler)

The answer is C. To solve a verb tense question, look for clues to time in the sentence. Here there are two: the phrase “in the last century” and the verb “were abolished,” which is joined to the underlined verb by “and.” Both place the action in the past, so the verb should be the simple past, “took.” Choices A and D are present tense and choice B is future, so all three break the sequence: the guilds were abolished in the past, so whatever did or did not take their place belongs to the past as well.

Strategy Insights

  1. Good writing does not “make the reader wait.” What we mean is that if a writer delays the main subject and verb until late in the sentence, the reader is prone to confusion (not to mention impatience!). Imagine someone saying to you, “Yesterday, after I had finished mowing the lawn, before I went inside to get a glass of water, because I was feeling really thirsty, having been outside for nearly three hours …” How exasperating! Get to the point, already! This admittedly extreme example demonstrates why, if given a choice between longer portions of text, we should look for the answer that releases the tension by describing the main action of the sentence.
  2. Make sure to also remember the “Handlebar Rule”: If a word or phrase in a sentence seems not necessary to its grammatical structure, imagine surrounding the word or phrase with commas, then grabbing those commas and pulling out the word or phrase. If the sentence still sounds grammatically correct (even if it has lost a little of its meaning), you have identified a word or phrase that must be preceded and followed by commas.

For Reflection

  1. Rate the difficulty of CLT Grammar & Writing Modern/Influential Thinkers passage for you from 1 (no problem) to 5 (problem!). This will help you decide how much time to spend preparing for this passage.
  2. Did any of the exercises in this lesson reveal areas of grammar or written expression you need to practice further? Note those carefully and practice them at every opportunity.

DIRECT Method & Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage

  • DIRECT Method applies grammar/writing skills to modern, influential texts
  • Focus on language and issues relevant to contemporary readers
  • Practice format differs from official CLT; use official materials for test simulation

Grammar & Style Questions

  • Introductory phrases require a comma after them
  • Match tone and style to the author’s formal, clear phrasing
  • Choose words that fit context and maintain intended meaning

Key Vocabulary & Usage

  • “Servitude” = forced status of bondage; negative connotation
  • Adverbs modify verbs (e.g., “progressively taken shape”)
  • Verb tense must match parallel structure in sentences

Strategy Insights

  • Avoid delaying main subject and verb; clarity comes first
  • “Handlebar Rule”: nonessential phrases should be set off by commas and removable without breaking grammar

Self-Assessment & Reflection

  • Rate personal difficulty with passage type (1–5 scale)
  • Identify and practice weak grammar or expression areas revealed by exercises

Sign up for free to take 5 quiz questions on this topic

Previous
Next  | 3.2.1 Word Choice Questions
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage

Introduction

This section will apply the DIRECT Method to a CLT Modern/Influential Thinkers passage. As the name implies, this Grammar & Writing passage will feature language familiar to the modern reader. The content is often similar to that found in the Philosophy/Religion passage but typically from a more modern point of view–in some cases, directly addressing an issue of ongoing significance to today’s world.

DIRECT to the Source: The Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage

In this section, you’ll find part of an encyclical from Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum (1891), in the translation printed in The Great Encyclical Letters of Pope Leo XIII (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1903), found in the Internet Archive. After each paragraph, you’ll find questions tied to the underlined portions in the paragraph. This format does not exactly mimic the format of the CLT, where the entire passage appears on the left and the questions on the right, so be sure to practice with official CLT materials as well.

That the spirit of revolutionary change, which has long been disturbing the nations of the world, should have passed beyond the sphere of politics and made its influence felt in the cognate sphere of practical economics is not surprising. The elements of the conflict now raging are unmistakable in the vast expansion of industrial pursuits and the marvelous discoveries of [1] science, in the changed relations between masters and workmen; in the enormous fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the masses; in the increased self-reliance and closer mutual combination of the working classes; as also, finally, in the prevailing moral degeneracy. The momentous gravity of the state of things now obtaining fills every mind with painful [2] apprehension; [3] smart folks are chewing it over; practical men are proposing schemes; popular meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all busied with it—and actually there is no question which has taken a deeper hold on the public mind.

1. science, in

A. NO CHANGE
B. science; in
C. science: in
D. science. In

(spoiler)

The answer is B. This sentence lists the places where “the conflict now raging” shows itself, and some items in that list contain commas of their own: “in the enormous fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the masses.” When the items in a series contain commas, separate the items with semicolons, so the reader can see where each item ends. Leo puts a semicolon between all the other items, and this boundary should match. Choice A leaves a comma that blurs into the commas inside the items. Choice C is wrong because a colon announces that what follows explains or lists what came before, but “in the changed relations between masters and workmen” does neither; it is simply the next item in the same list, parallel to “in the vast expansion of industrial pursuits.” Choice D creates a fragment: “In the changed relations between masters and workmen” has no subject or verb of its own (remember the Clause Test).

2. apprehension

A. NO CHANGE
B. appeasement
C. approbation
D. appropriation

(spoiler)

The answer is A. This is a word choice question, and the four choices sound alike, so meaning has to decide it. The sentence says that the “momentous gravity” of the situation fills every mind with something “painful,” and the rest of the sentence shows people discussing the problem and proposing remedies. We need a word for worry about what is coming. That is “apprehension,” an anxious fear that something bad will happen. “Approbation” means approval, far too positive for a “painful” state of mind. “Appeasement,” calming someone by giving in to his demands, is an action, not a feeling that could fill a mind, and “appropriation,” the act of taking something for one’s own use, makes no sense here either.

3. smart folks are chewing it over

A. NO CHANGE
B. sagacious personages are engaged in protracted deliberations upon its manifold ramifications
C. wise men are discussing it
D. everybody with a brain is talking about it

(spoiler)

The answer is C. This is a tone/style question, so we need to match the wording to the way the author writes. Leo writes formally and with weight, in long, balanced sentences, but his words are plain and clear. Notice, too, that the underlined portion begins a series of parallel clauses: “___; practical men are proposing schemes; popular meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all busied with it.” The right answer should sound like its neighbors.

Choice B is the overstuffed answer that tone/style questions usually include; “sagacious personages” and “manifold ramifications” are far grander than anything around them. Choices A and D go to the other extreme: “chewing it over” and “everybody with a brain” are much too casual for this writer. Choice C has the same simple, dignified shape as “practical men are proposing schemes.”

… But all agree, and there can be no question whatever, that some remedy must be found, and found quickly, for the misery and wretchedness pressing so heavily and [4] unjust at this moment on the vast majority of the working classes.

4. unjust

A. NO CHANGE
B. injustice
C. unjustified
D. unjustly

(spoiler)

The answer is D. Among our choices for this part of speech question, choice A is an adjective, choice B a noun, choice C an adjective formed from a verb, and choice D an adverb. The underlined word tells how the misery is “pressing” on the working classes, and “pressing” is a verb form. A word that modifies a verb is an adverb. The word is also joined by “and” to “heavily,” another adverb, so the two should match: “pressing so heavily and unjustly.”

For the ancient workingmen’s guilds were abolished in the last century, and no other organization [5] takes their place. Public institutions and the very laws have set aside the ancient religion. Hence by degrees it has come to pass that workingmen have been surrendered, all isolated and helpless, to the hard-heartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition. … To this must be added the custom of working by contract, and the concentration of so many branches of trade in the hands of a few individuals, so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slavery itself.

5. takes

A. NO CHANGE
B. will take
C. took
D. is taking

(spoiler)

The answer is C. To solve a verb tense question, look for clues to time in the sentence. Here there are two: the phrase “in the last century” and the verb “were abolished,” which is joined to the underlined verb by “and.” Both place the action in the past, so the verb should be the simple past, “took.” Choices A and D are present tense and choice B is future, so all three break the sequence: the guilds were abolished in the past, so whatever did or did not take their place belongs to the past as well.

Strategy Insights

  1. Good writing does not “make the reader wait.” What we mean is that if a writer delays the main subject and verb until late in the sentence, the reader is prone to confusion (not to mention impatience!). Imagine someone saying to you, “Yesterday, after I had finished mowing the lawn, before I went inside to get a glass of water, because I was feeling really thirsty, having been outside for nearly three hours …” How exasperating! Get to the point, already! This admittedly extreme example demonstrates why, if given a choice between longer portions of text, we should look for the answer that releases the tension by describing the main action of the sentence.
  2. Make sure to also remember the “Handlebar Rule”: If a word or phrase in a sentence seems not necessary to its grammatical structure, imagine surrounding the word or phrase with commas, then grabbing those commas and pulling out the word or phrase. If the sentence still sounds grammatically correct (even if it has lost a little of its meaning), you have identified a word or phrase that must be preceded and followed by commas.

For Reflection

  1. Rate the difficulty of CLT Grammar & Writing Modern/Influential Thinkers passage for you from 1 (no problem) to 5 (problem!). This will help you decide how much time to spend preparing for this passage.
  2. Did any of the exercises in this lesson reveal areas of grammar or written expression you need to practice further? Note those carefully and practice them at every opportunity.
Key points

DIRECT Method & Modern/Influential Thinkers Passage

  • DIRECT Method applies grammar/writing skills to modern, influential texts
  • Focus on language and issues relevant to contemporary readers
  • Practice format differs from official CLT; use official materials for test simulation

Grammar & Style Questions

  • Introductory phrases require a comma after them
  • Match tone and style to the author’s formal, clear phrasing
  • Choose words that fit context and maintain intended meaning

Key Vocabulary & Usage

  • “Servitude” = forced status of bondage; negative connotation
  • Adverbs modify verbs (e.g., “progressively taken shape”)
  • Verb tense must match parallel structure in sentences

Strategy Insights

  • Avoid delaying main subject and verb; clarity comes first
  • “Handlebar Rule”: nonessential phrases should be set off by commas and removable without breaking grammar

Self-Assessment & Reflection

  • Rate personal difficulty with passage type (1–5 scale)
  • Identify and practice weak grammar or expression areas revealed by exercises

More from Intro and Passage Types

  • The DIRECT Method
  • Philosophy/Religion Passage
  • Historical Profile Passage
  • Science Passage