Achievable logoAchievable logo
AP Calculus AB
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
Introduction
1. Limits
1.1 Tables and graphs
1.2 Analytical limits
1.3 Algebraic limits
1.4 Limits and infinity
1.4.1 Vertical asymptotes
1.4.2 Horizontal asymptotes
1.5 Special limits
1.6 Continuity
2. Derivative basics
3. Advanced differentiation
4. Contextual uses
5. Analytical uses
6. Integration
7. Differential equations
8. Applications of integrals
Wrapping up
Achievable logoAchievable logo
1.4.2 Horizontal asymptotes
Achievable AP Calculus AB
1. Limits
1.4. Limits and infinity
Our AP Calculus AB course is now in "early access" - get 50% off for a limited time.

Horizontal asymptotes

8 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

What you’ll learn

  • How to evaluate limits at infinity (horizontal asymptotes) using dominant term analysis
  • Handling limits at infinity involving square roots

Limits at infinity describe what happens to f(x) as x becomes very large in the positive or negative direction (as x→±∞). These limits often reveal horizontal asymptotes, which describe the end behavior of the function.

By definition, y=L is a horizontal asymptote of f(x) (where L is finite) if, as x approaches infinity,

x→+∞lim​f(x)=L or x→−∞lim​f(x)=L

For limits of rational functions as x→±∞, direct substitution often results in the indeterminate form ∞∞​. A quick method to evaluate these limits is dominant term analysis, which compares the highest powers (degrees) in the numerator and denominator. The function behaves according to which term grows the fastest, leading to three cases:

Dominant term analysis:

For a rational function h(x)=g(x)f(x)​,

Case 1

If the degree of f(x)<g(x), then the horizontal asymptote is y=0, e.g.

x→∞lim​x4+1x3−1​=0

Case 2

If the degree of f(x)=g(x), then the horizontal asymptote is the ratio of the leading coefficients, e.g.

x→∞lim​3x2+12x2−1​=32​

Case 3

If the degree of f(x)>g(x), then there is no horizontal asymptote since h(x) increases or decreases without bound. The limit is either ∞ or−∞, e.g.

x→∞lim​2x3+1x4−1​=∞

The idea is that when x has a large magnitude, the highest-power terms dominate the behavior, and lower-power terms become negligible.

The formal algebraic method behind the shortcut is to divide every term by the highest power of x in the denominator and simplify.

This approach is most useful for limits that fit case 3, where the resulting infinity depends on how the leading coefficients and degrees interact. For example,

x→−∞lim​−2x2+1x5−x​

First, divide by the highest power of x in the denominator, which is x2, and simplify:

=​x→−∞lim​−x22x2​+x21​x2x5​−x2x​​x→−∞lim​−2+x21​x3−x1​​​

Then as x approaches −∞, both x1​ and x21​ approach 0, so the expression behaves like

x→−∞lim​−2x3​

Since x3 approaches −∞ as x→−∞, the negative signs cancel and

x→−∞lim​−2x3​=∞

Examples

Case 1. Evaluate

x→−∞lim​3x2−2x+x4+1−x3+x−1​

(spoiler)

Although not written in standard form, the polynomial in the numerator has a degree of 3 while the denominator has a degree of 4.

Since the top degree < bottom degree, this fits case 1, so the limit should be 0. Essentially, for a large magnitude of x, the expression can be reduced to the highest powers in the numerator and denominator:

x→−∞lim​x4−x3​=x→−∞lim​−x1​=0

Graphing the function confirms the horizontal asymptote to be y=0.

Case 2. Find the horizontal asymptote(s) of

f(x)=x−4x3−3−2x3+x−1​

(spoiler)

To find horizontal asymptote(s), evaluate both x→∞lim​f(x) and x→−∞lim​f(x).

Both the numerator and the denominator have a degree of 3, so the limit to both infinities is just the ratio of the leading coefficients.

x→±∞lim​x−4x3−3−2x3+x−1​=−4−2​=21​

Therefore the only horizontal asymptote is y=21​.

Case 3. Evaluate

x→−∞lim​−5x3−x−2x4+x−1​

(spoiler)

The numerator has a degree of 4 and the denominator has a degree of 3 (case 3). For a large magnitude of x, the expression can be reduced to

x→−∞lim​−5x3−2x4​=x→−∞lim​52x​=−∞

Square roots

Another common situation is a limit at infinity that includes square roots. A reliable strategy is:

  • Rewrite the expression so you can factor out the highest power of x inside the radical.
  • Be careful with x2​: it equals ∣x∣, not x.

Let

f(x)=3+x2​−3​x​

Evaluate:

a) x→∞lim​f(x)

b) x→−∞lim​f(x)

Solutions

a) x→∞lim​f(x)

(spoiler)

Direct substitution gives the indeterminate form ∞∞​.

Inside the square root, the highest power is x2. Factor it out:

x→∞lim​x2(x23​+1)​−3​x​

Separate the radical:

x→∞lim​(x2​⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

The next step is important:

Since x2​=∣x∣,

x→∞lim​(∣x∣⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

To handle ∣x∣, use the fact that for x→∞, we have the positive branch ∣x∣=x. Then

x→∞lim​(x⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

Factor x in the denominator before canceling:

x→∞lim​x​⋅(x23​+1​−x3​​)x​​=x→∞lim​x23​+1​−x3​​1​

As x→∞, both x23​ and x3​​ approach 0, so

0+1​−01​=1

b) x→−∞lim​f(x)

(spoiler)

The algebra is the same as in part (a) up to the point where x2​ becomes ∣x∣:

x→−∞lim​(∣x∣⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

Because this problem has x→−∞, use ∣x∣=−x. Substitute that piece:

x→−∞lim​(−x⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

Factor −x from the denominator:

x→−∞lim​−x​⋅(x23​+1​+x3​​)x​​=x→−∞lim​−(x23​+1​+x3​​)1​

As x→−∞, both x23​ and x3​​ approach 0, so

−(0+1​+0)1​=−1

Not all limits at infinity begin with rational functions. For example, to evaluate

x→∞lim​(x2+4x​−x)

use the conjugate to rewrite the expression as a rational expression.

(spoiler)

Direct substitution gives the indeterminate form ∞−∞ (which is not 0). Multiply by the conjugate:

x→∞lim​(x2+4x​−x)⋅x2+4x​+xx2+4x​+x​=x→∞lim​x2+4x​+x(x2+4x)−x2​=x→∞lim​x2+4x​+x4x​

Now factor out the highest power of x inside the square root:

x→∞lim​x2(1+x4​)​+x4x​=x→∞lim​(x⋅1+x4​​)+x4x​=x→∞lim​x​⋅(1+x4​​+1)4x​​

As x→∞, x4​→0, so

1+0​+14​=2

Limits at infinity & horizontal asymptotes

  • Describe end behavior as x→±∞
  • Horizontal asymptote: limx→±∞​f(x)=L⟹y=L
  • Dominant term analysis: compare highest degree terms in numerator & denominator

Dominant term analysis for rational functions

  • Degree numerator < degree denominator: limit =0 (asymptote y=0)
  • Degree numerator = degree denominator: limit = ratio of leading coefficients
  • Degree numerator > degree denominator: limit →±∞ (no horizontal asymptote)

Algebraic method for limits at infinity

  • Divide all terms by highest power of x in denominator
  • Simplify and analyze behavior as x→±∞
  • Useful for determining sign and value in case 3

Square roots in limits at infinity

  • Factor out highest power of x inside the radical
  • x2​=∣x∣; use ∣x∣=x for x→∞, ∣x∣=−x for x→−∞
  • Simplify and evaluate after factoring

Special techniques for indeterminate forms

  • For ∞−∞ with radicals: multiply by conjugate to convert to rational form
  • Factor and cancel highest powers, then take limit

Key examples

  • Rational function with degree numerator < denominator: limit =0
  • Rational function with equal degrees: limit = ratio of leading coefficients
  • Rational function with degree numerator > denominator: limit →±∞
  • Square root expressions: factor, use ∣x∣, and simplify
  • Use conjugate for x2+bx​−x type expressions to resolve ∞−∞
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Horizontal asymptotes

What you’ll learn

  • How to evaluate limits at infinity (horizontal asymptotes) using dominant term analysis
  • Handling limits at infinity involving square roots

Limits at infinity describe what happens to f(x) as x becomes very large in the positive or negative direction (as x→±∞). These limits often reveal horizontal asymptotes, which describe the end behavior of the function.

By definition, y=L is a horizontal asymptote of f(x) (where L is finite) if, as x approaches infinity,

x→+∞lim​f(x)=L or x→−∞lim​f(x)=L

For limits of rational functions as x→±∞, direct substitution often results in the indeterminate form ∞∞​. A quick method to evaluate these limits is dominant term analysis, which compares the highest powers (degrees) in the numerator and denominator. The function behaves according to which term grows the fastest, leading to three cases:

Dominant term analysis:

For a rational function h(x)=g(x)f(x)​,

Case 1

If the degree of f(x)<g(x), then the horizontal asymptote is y=0, e.g.

x→∞lim​x4+1x3−1​=0

Case 2

If the degree of f(x)=g(x), then the horizontal asymptote is the ratio of the leading coefficients, e.g.

x→∞lim​3x2+12x2−1​=32​

Case 3

If the degree of f(x)>g(x), then there is no horizontal asymptote since h(x) increases or decreases without bound. The limit is either ∞ or−∞, e.g.

x→∞lim​2x3+1x4−1​=∞

The idea is that when x has a large magnitude, the highest-power terms dominate the behavior, and lower-power terms become negligible.

The formal algebraic method behind the shortcut is to divide every term by the highest power of x in the denominator and simplify.

This approach is most useful for limits that fit case 3, where the resulting infinity depends on how the leading coefficients and degrees interact. For example,

x→−∞lim​−2x2+1x5−x​

First, divide by the highest power of x in the denominator, which is x2, and simplify:

=​x→−∞lim​−x22x2​+x21​x2x5​−x2x​​x→−∞lim​−2+x21​x3−x1​​​

Then as x approaches −∞, both x1​ and x21​ approach 0, so the expression behaves like

x→−∞lim​−2x3​

Since x3 approaches −∞ as x→−∞, the negative signs cancel and

x→−∞lim​−2x3​=∞

Examples

Case 1. Evaluate

x→−∞lim​3x2−2x+x4+1−x3+x−1​

(spoiler)

Although not written in standard form, the polynomial in the numerator has a degree of 3 while the denominator has a degree of 4.

Since the top degree < bottom degree, this fits case 1, so the limit should be 0. Essentially, for a large magnitude of x, the expression can be reduced to the highest powers in the numerator and denominator:

x→−∞lim​x4−x3​=x→−∞lim​−x1​=0

Graphing the function confirms the horizontal asymptote to be y=0.

Case 2. Find the horizontal asymptote(s) of

f(x)=x−4x3−3−2x3+x−1​

(spoiler)

To find horizontal asymptote(s), evaluate both x→∞lim​f(x) and x→−∞lim​f(x).

Both the numerator and the denominator have a degree of 3, so the limit to both infinities is just the ratio of the leading coefficients.

x→±∞lim​x−4x3−3−2x3+x−1​=−4−2​=21​

Therefore the only horizontal asymptote is y=21​.

Case 3. Evaluate

x→−∞lim​−5x3−x−2x4+x−1​

(spoiler)

The numerator has a degree of 4 and the denominator has a degree of 3 (case 3). For a large magnitude of x, the expression can be reduced to

x→−∞lim​−5x3−2x4​=x→−∞lim​52x​=−∞

Square roots

Another common situation is a limit at infinity that includes square roots. A reliable strategy is:

  • Rewrite the expression so you can factor out the highest power of x inside the radical.
  • Be careful with x2​: it equals ∣x∣, not x.

Let

f(x)=3+x2​−3​x​

Evaluate:

a) x→∞lim​f(x)

b) x→−∞lim​f(x)

Solutions

a) x→∞lim​f(x)

(spoiler)

Direct substitution gives the indeterminate form ∞∞​.

Inside the square root, the highest power is x2. Factor it out:

x→∞lim​x2(x23​+1)​−3​x​

Separate the radical:

x→∞lim​(x2​⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

The next step is important:

Since x2​=∣x∣,

x→∞lim​(∣x∣⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

To handle ∣x∣, use the fact that for x→∞, we have the positive branch ∣x∣=x. Then

x→∞lim​(x⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

Factor x in the denominator before canceling:

x→∞lim​x​⋅(x23​+1​−x3​​)x​​=x→∞lim​x23​+1​−x3​​1​

As x→∞, both x23​ and x3​​ approach 0, so

0+1​−01​=1

b) x→−∞lim​f(x)

(spoiler)

The algebra is the same as in part (a) up to the point where x2​ becomes ∣x∣:

x→−∞lim​(∣x∣⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

Because this problem has x→−∞, use ∣x∣=−x. Substitute that piece:

x→−∞lim​(−x⋅x23​+1​)−3​x​

Factor −x from the denominator:

x→−∞lim​−x​⋅(x23​+1​+x3​​)x​​=x→−∞lim​−(x23​+1​+x3​​)1​

As x→−∞, both x23​ and x3​​ approach 0, so

−(0+1​+0)1​=−1

Not all limits at infinity begin with rational functions. For example, to evaluate

x→∞lim​(x2+4x​−x)

use the conjugate to rewrite the expression as a rational expression.

(spoiler)

Direct substitution gives the indeterminate form ∞−∞ (which is not 0). Multiply by the conjugate:

x→∞lim​(x2+4x​−x)⋅x2+4x​+xx2+4x​+x​=x→∞lim​x2+4x​+x(x2+4x)−x2​=x→∞lim​x2+4x​+x4x​

Now factor out the highest power of x inside the square root:

x→∞lim​x2(1+x4​)​+x4x​=x→∞lim​(x⋅1+x4​​)+x4x​=x→∞lim​x​⋅(1+x4​​+1)4x​​

As x→∞, x4​→0, so

1+0​+14​=2

Key points

Limits at infinity & horizontal asymptotes

  • Describe end behavior as x→±∞
  • Horizontal asymptote: limx→±∞​f(x)=L⟹y=L
  • Dominant term analysis: compare highest degree terms in numerator & denominator

Dominant term analysis for rational functions

  • Degree numerator < degree denominator: limit =0 (asymptote y=0)
  • Degree numerator = degree denominator: limit = ratio of leading coefficients
  • Degree numerator > degree denominator: limit →±∞ (no horizontal asymptote)

Algebraic method for limits at infinity

  • Divide all terms by highest power of x in denominator
  • Simplify and analyze behavior as x→±∞
  • Useful for determining sign and value in case 3

Square roots in limits at infinity

  • Factor out highest power of x inside the radical
  • x2​=∣x∣; use ∣x∣=x for x→∞, ∣x∣=−x for x→−∞
  • Simplify and evaluate after factoring

Special techniques for indeterminate forms

  • For ∞−∞ with radicals: multiply by conjugate to convert to rational form
  • Factor and cancel highest powers, then take limit

Key examples

  • Rational function with degree numerator < denominator: limit =0
  • Rational function with equal degrees: limit = ratio of leading coefficients
  • Rational function with degree numerator > denominator: limit →±∞
  • Square root expressions: factor, use ∣x∣, and simplify
  • Use conjugate for x2+bx​−x type expressions to resolve ∞−∞

More from Limits and infinity

  • Vertical asymptotes