Another application of derivatives is evaluating limits in indeterminate form or with L’Hopital’s rule. Instead of applying different methods such as dominant term analysis, simply take the derivatives of the numerator and the denominator separately and re-evaluate. Repeat the process until direct substitution no longer results in either of those two indeterminate forms.
Recall the special trig limit . Other methods like the squeeze theorem can be used to prove this limit, but we’ll show how to use L’Hopital’s rule on it.
Since direct substitution results in , apply L’Hopital’s rule.
Therefore
Re-evaluating the limit with direct substitution results in .
Here are a few more examples where direct substitution results in .
Applying L’Hopital’s rule,
L’Hopital’s rule can also be applied when direct substitution results in the indeterminate form .
Since direct substitution still produces the same indeterminate form, L’Hopital’s rule can be applied again.
Applying it again,
Since direct substitution results in 6 over a very large value, the limit is .
Applying L’Hopital’s rule,
Applying L’Hopital’s rule again until it’s no longer needed,
Since the both cancel out, the limit is .
L’Hopital’s rule can only be applied to quotients, so when this indeterminate form results from an expression , rewrite it either as or depending on which form’s denominator is easier to differentiate or will lead somewhere. For example,
can be written either as
or
The 1st option takes on the form while the 2nd is . Let’s try applying L’Hopital’s rule on the 1st one.
Hm…this doesn’t seem like it will go anywhere because differentiating the denominator will just increase the exponent on and the will never go away. So let’s work with the 2nd option.
is an indeterminate form because the limit is not necessarily , as it may seem.
Find
Combine into one rational expression.
Direct substitution results in so L’Hopital’s rule can be applied.
again, so using L’Hopital’s:
When direct substitution results in any of these indeterminate forms, resolve it by using the power property of logarithms.
Let
Direct substitution at this step results in . Apply the previous technique of turning into a quotient.
Then L’Hopital’s rule can be applied because direct substitution results in .
After canceling the limit becomes
using either dominant term analysis or applying L’Hopital’s rule again.
Remember that the other side throughout this process was and the goal was to find just (which we defined as the limit problem). Solving for ,
Therefore
Let .
Then taking the natural log of both sides,
As , the limit approaches . So L’Hopital’s rule can be applied.
Since . Therefore
Alternatively, if we make the substitution , note that as , and .
Then the limit in terms of is
Which looks just like the limit definition of from the previous problem!
Because forever oscillates, it doesn’t settle on a single number as . This limit isn’t even in the form and .
Direct substitution results in . Let
Then
Since ,
Sign up for free to take 8 quiz questions on this topic