Board of Directors
Stockholders don’t have the authority to run an issuer’s day-to-day business operations. However, they still influence major decisions by voting for the individuals who serve on the board of directors (BODs). The BODs set a company’s overall direction through actions such as:
- Hiring and/or firing senior-level employees
- Managing senior-level employee compensation
- Creating and implementing general company policies
- Approving dividend payouts to investors
This setup is similar to a democratic republic in the United States. U.S. citizens don’t directly create or change laws, but they can vote for the politicians who do. If a politician isn’t doing the job well, voters can replace them in the next election. Stockholders work in a similar way: they don’t manage the issuer’s business, but they can vote in (and vote out) the people on the BOD who make major enterprise-level decisions.
Companies use one of two voting structures for electing the BOD: statutory or cumulative. In both systems, each stockholder gets one vote for every share they own. The difference is how those votes can be allocated across open board seats.
Statutory
A statutory voting structure requires stockholders to spread their votes evenly across the open BOD positions. In other words, you can cast only the number of votes you have per seat for each position. This structure tends to benefit larger stockholders.
An investor owns 100 shares of stock with a statutory voting structure. There are 3 open board positions.
The investor has 300 votes
- 100 shares x 3 open positions
- The investor can only apply up to 100 votes per open position
Cumulative
A cumulative voting structure lets stockholders allocate their total votes across the open BOD positions in any way they choose. This structure tends to benefit smaller stockholders.
An investor owns 100 shares of stock with a cumulative voting structure. There are 3 open board positions.
The investor has 300 votes
- 100 shares x 3 open positions
- The investor can apply up to 300 votes in any manner
A key difference is that cumulative voting allows a stockholder to concentrate all votes on a single board seat. Using the example above, suppose the stockholder strongly supports John for one BOD position:
- With statutory voting, they could apply only 100 votes to John.
- With cumulative voting, they could apply up to 300 votes to John.
Because votes can be concentrated this way, cumulative voting structures often favor small investors. A group of smaller shareholders can work together and devote all their votes to one open position.
Watch this video to better understand how voting rights work in the real world: