This browser is too old to run Achievable.

Update it, or open this page in a current version of Chrome, Safari, Firefox or Edge. On an iPhone or iPad, update iOS: every browser there runs on the version of Safari that comes with it.

Achievable logoAchievable logo
CMA Part 1
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Resources
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
Introduction
1. External financial reporting decisions
2. Planning, budgeting, and forecasting
3. Performance management
4. Cost management
4.1 Measurement concepts
4.1.1 Cost behavior, cost objects, and cost pools
4.1.2 Product and period costs, cost drivers, and cost measurement methods
4.1.3 Inventory cost flow: trading vs. manufacturing
4.1.4 Absorption vs. variable costing: impact on inventory and income
4.1.5 Absorption vs. variable costing: illustrative problem
4.1.6 Joint and by-product costing: key concepts
4.1.7 Joint and by-product costing: cost allocation methods and by-product costing
4.2 Costing systems
4.3 Overhead costs
4.4 Supply chain management
4.5 Business process improvement
5. Internal control
6. Technology and analytics
Wrapping up
Achievable logoAchievable logo
4.1.5 Absorption vs. variable costing: illustrative problem
Achievable CMA Part 1
4. Cost management
4.1. Measurement concepts
Our CMA Part 1 course is currently in development and is a work-in-progress.

Absorption vs. variable costing: illustrative problem

3 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

Illustrative problem: absorption vs. variable costing

Absorption costing carries fixed manufacturing overhead in inventory as a product cost, while variable costing expenses it immediately as a period cost.

A company manufactures a single product. The following data is provided for the month:

Description Amount
Beginning inventory 0 units
Units produced 10,000 units
Units sold 8,000 units
Selling price per unit $15.00
Variable manufacturing cost per unit $6.00
Total fixed manufacturing overhead $40,000
Variable selling & administrative cost $2.00 per unit sold
Fixed selling & administrative expenses $20,000

Required:

  1. Compute unit product cost under absorption and variable costing.
  2. Prepare an income statement under each method.
  3. Reconcile the difference in operating income.

1. Unit product cost comparison

Cost component Absorption costing Variable costing
Direct materials + labor + VMOH $6.00 $6.00
Fixed manufacturing OH/unit $4.00 ($40,000 ÷ 10,000) –
Total unit product cost $10.00 $6.00

2. Operating income comparison

Income statement Absorption costing Variable costing
Sales (8,000 × $15) $120,000 $120,000
COGS (8,000 × $10) = $80,000 (8,000 × $6) = $48,000
Gross margin $40,000 –
Variable selling & admin (8,000 × $2) $16,000 $16,000
Contribution margin – $56,000
Fixed selling & admin $20,000 $20,000
Fixed manufacturing OH (period cost) – $40,000
Operating income $4,000 –$4,000

Absorption income is $8,000 higher because the 2,000 units added to inventory this month carry $4 of fixed overhead each, deferred instead of expensed.

3. Reconciliation of income difference

Reconciliation item Amount
Difference in operating income (Absorption – Variable) $8,000
Reason: Fixed OH deferred in ending inventory
= 2,000 units × $4 fixed OH/unit $8,000

Key rule: The income difference equals the change in inventory units × fixed overhead per unit. Production > sales: absorption income is higher (overhead deferred in inventory). Production < sales: variable income is higher (prior overhead released). Production = sales: the two methods report equal income.

Joint and by-product costing, activity-based costing, overhead allocation, and cost of quality are each covered in their own dedicated chapters later in the course.

Absorption vs. Variable Costing Basics

  • Absorption costing: fixed manufacturing overhead (FMOH) included in product cost, capitalized in inventory
  • Variable costing: FMOH expensed immediately as period cost
  • Unit product cost formula differs:
    • Absorption = variable mfg cost/unit + (total FMOH ÷ units produced)
    • Variable = variable mfg cost/unit only

Income Statement Structures

  • Absorption costing: Sales – COGS = Gross margin; then subtract selling & admin expenses
  • Variable costing: Sales – variable costs (COGS + variable S&A) = Contribution margin; then subtract all fixed costs (including FMOH)
  • Same sales/variable S&A figures across both methods, but COGS and treatment of FMOH differ, causing different operating income

Reconciling the Income Difference

  • Difference in income = change in inventory units × fixed OH per unit
  • Key rule:
    • Production > Sales → Absorption income higher (FMOH deferred in ending inventory)
    • Production < Sales → Variable income higher (prior period FMOH released from inventory)
    • Production = Sales → Both methods report equal income
  • Example: 2,000 unsold units × $4 FMOH/unit = $8,000 difference (absorption income exceeds variable income)

Sign up for free to take 12 quiz questions on this topic

Previous
Next  | 4.1.6 Joint and by-product costing: key concepts
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Absorption vs. variable costing: illustrative problem

Illustrative problem: absorption vs. variable costing

Absorption costing carries fixed manufacturing overhead in inventory as a product cost, while variable costing expenses it immediately as a period cost.

A company manufactures a single product. The following data is provided for the month:

Description Amount
Beginning inventory 0 units
Units produced 10,000 units
Units sold 8,000 units
Selling price per unit $15.00
Variable manufacturing cost per unit $6.00
Total fixed manufacturing overhead $40,000
Variable selling & administrative cost $2.00 per unit sold
Fixed selling & administrative expenses $20,000

Required:

  1. Compute unit product cost under absorption and variable costing.
  2. Prepare an income statement under each method.
  3. Reconcile the difference in operating income.

1. Unit product cost comparison

Cost component Absorption costing Variable costing
Direct materials + labor + VMOH $6.00 $6.00
Fixed manufacturing OH/unit $4.00 ($40,000 ÷ 10,000) –
Total unit product cost $10.00 $6.00

2. Operating income comparison

Income statement Absorption costing Variable costing
Sales (8,000 × $15) $120,000 $120,000
COGS (8,000 × $10) = $80,000 (8,000 × $6) = $48,000
Gross margin $40,000 –
Variable selling & admin (8,000 × $2) $16,000 $16,000
Contribution margin – $56,000
Fixed selling & admin $20,000 $20,000
Fixed manufacturing OH (period cost) – $40,000
Operating income $4,000 –$4,000

Absorption income is $8,000 higher because the 2,000 units added to inventory this month carry $4 of fixed overhead each, deferred instead of expensed.

3. Reconciliation of income difference

Reconciliation item Amount
Difference in operating income (Absorption – Variable) $8,000
Reason: Fixed OH deferred in ending inventory
= 2,000 units × $4 fixed OH/unit $8,000

Key rule: The income difference equals the change in inventory units × fixed overhead per unit. Production > sales: absorption income is higher (overhead deferred in inventory). Production < sales: variable income is higher (prior overhead released). Production = sales: the two methods report equal income.

Joint and by-product costing, activity-based costing, overhead allocation, and cost of quality are each covered in their own dedicated chapters later in the course.

Key points

Absorption vs. Variable Costing Basics

  • Absorption costing: fixed manufacturing overhead (FMOH) included in product cost, capitalized in inventory
  • Variable costing: FMOH expensed immediately as period cost
  • Unit product cost formula differs:
    • Absorption = variable mfg cost/unit + (total FMOH ÷ units produced)
    • Variable = variable mfg cost/unit only

Income Statement Structures

  • Absorption costing: Sales – COGS = Gross margin; then subtract selling & admin expenses
  • Variable costing: Sales – variable costs (COGS + variable S&A) = Contribution margin; then subtract all fixed costs (including FMOH)
  • Same sales/variable S&A figures across both methods, but COGS and treatment of FMOH differ, causing different operating income

Reconciling the Income Difference

  • Difference in income = change in inventory units × fixed OH per unit
  • Key rule:
    • Production > Sales → Absorption income higher (FMOH deferred in ending inventory)
    • Production < Sales → Variable income higher (prior period FMOH released from inventory)
    • Production = Sales → Both methods report equal income
  • Example: 2,000 unsold units × $4 FMOH/unit = $8,000 difference (absorption income exceeds variable income)

More from Measurement concepts

  • Cost behavior, cost objects, and cost pools
  • Product and period costs, cost drivers, and cost measurement methods
  • Inventory cost flow: trading vs. manufacturing
  • Absorption vs. variable costing: impact on inventory and income
  • Joint and by-product costing: key concepts