Achievable logoAchievable logo
AP Statistics
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Resources
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
Introduction
1. One variable data
2. Two variable data
3. Data collection
4. Probability and random variables
5. Sampling distributions
5.1 Calculations for the normal distribution
5.2 Central limit theorem
5.3 Biased and unbiased estimators
5.4 Sample proportions
5.5 Sample means
5.6 Sampling distribution simulations
6. Categorical data
7. Quantitative data
8. Chi-square
9. Linear regression
Wrapping up
Achievable logoAchievable logo
5.4 Sample proportions
Achievable AP Statistics
5. Sampling distributions
Our AP Statistics course is currently in development and is a work-in-progress.

Sample proportions

7 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

Sampling distribution of sample proportions

When you work with sample proportions, you’re measuring the proportion of successes in a sample.

Definitions
Success
An outcome where the individual has the characteristic being studied.
Failure
An outcome where the individual does not have the characteristic being studied.

For example, if the question is “What proportion of high school students have at least one cat?”, then a success is a student who has at least one cat, and a failure is a student who has no cats. The population is split into people who have the characteristic and people who don’t.

If you want to estimate a population proportion using a single sample proportion, it helps to understand how sample proportions typically vary from sample to sample.

Recall the binomial setting:

  • np is the mean number of successes.
  • np(1−p)​ is the standard deviation of the number of successes.
  • Large values of n are needed for the binomial distribution to be well-approximated by a normal distribution.

Proportion rather than count

Here, we care about the proportion of successes rather than the count. The idea is:

  1. Start with a population where the true success proportion is p.
  2. Consider all possible samples of size n.
  3. Compute the sample proportion p^​ for each sample.
Sidenote
Important to know!
  1. The set of all sample proportions is approximately normally distributed.
  2. The mean of the sampling distribution, μp^​​, equals the population proportion p. That is, μp^​​=p.
  3. The standard deviation of the sampling distribution is approximately:

σp^​​=np(1−p)​​

Overall, the sampling distribution of p^​ is approximately normal with mean p and standard deviation np(1−p)​​, as long as:

  • np≥10
  • n(1−p)≥10

Where n is the sample size and p is the probability of one success.

Practice problem

Example 1:

It is estimated that 30% of people will experience cancer in their lifetime. In a random sample of 150 people, what is the probability that less than 50 of them will experience cancer in their lifetime?

First, check the normal-approximation conditions np≥10 and n(1−p)≥10, where n=150 and p=0.3. In this context, a “success” means a person experiences cancer in their lifetime.

npn(1−p)​=150×0.3=45≥10✓=150×0.7=105≥10✓​

The sampling distribution of p^​ is approximately normal. Next, compute the standard deviation:

σp^​​​=np(1−p)​​=1500.3(0.7)​​=0.0014​≈0.0374​

The event “less than 50 out of 150” converts to a sample proportion:

p^​<15050​=0.33

Now compute the probability using a z-score:

P(p^​<0.33)​=P(z<0.03740.33−0.3​)=P(z<0.802)=0.7887​

Solution:

(spoiler)

The probability that fewer than 50 of the 150 people sampled will experience cancer is about 78.87%. If you repeatedly took many random samples of 150 people, about 78.87% of those samples would have fewer than 50 people who experience cancer in their lifetime.

Comparing two proportions

There are many real-world situations where you compare two population proportions.

For example:

  • Is the proportion of parents satisfied with public school education greater than the proportion satisfied with private school education?
  • How does the proportion of dentists who recommend toothbrush brand “A” compare to the proportion who recommend brand “B”?

In these settings, individuals might fall into different categories — a dentist might recommend only “A”, only “B”, both, or neither. The key question is whether an observed difference in sample proportions is large enough to be meaningful, or whether it can be explained by natural sample-to-sample variation.

The set of all differences of sample proportions is approximately normally distributed.

To compare sampling distributions of sample proportions:

  1. Start with two populations with proportions p1​ and p2​. Take samples of sizes n1​ and n2​.
  2. Compute the difference p^​1​−p^​2​ for each pair of samples.
  3. The mean of the sampling distribution of differences is p1​−p2​.
  4. The standard deviation (also the standard error) is:

σp^​1​−p^​2​​=n1​p1​(1−p1​)​+n2​p2​(1−p2​)​​

Practice problem

Example 2:

A researcher is testing whether a new study method improves test performance among students. He randomly assigns students to one of two groups: Group A uses the new study method and Group B uses the old study method. At the end of the term, 33 out of 80 students in Group A passed the final exam, while 52 out of 130 students in Group B passed. What is the probability that the observed difference in passing rates is at least 10%, assuming there is no actual difference between the two methods?

First, define and compute the sample proportions:

p^​1​p^​2​​=8033​=0.4125(Group A, new method)=13052​=0.4(Group B, old method)​

Assume the null hypothesis is true — that there is no real difference in population passing rates, so any observed difference is due to sampling variation:

H0​:p1​=p2​

Compute the standard error:

SE​=n1​p1​(1−p1​)​+n2​p2​(1−p2​)​​=800.4125(0.5875)​+1300.4(0.6)​​=800.242​+1300.24​​≈0.0698​

Now find the probability that the difference is at least 10%:

P(p^​1​−p^​2​≥0.10)​=P(Z≥0.06980.10−0.0125​)=P(Z≥1.2536)≈0.1056​

Solution:

(spoiler)

There is about a 10.56% chance of observing a difference of 10% or greater in passing rates due to natural sampling variation alone, assuming the two study methods are equally effective.

Continuity correction

When using the normal distribution to approximate binomial probabilities, it’s important to remember that the binomial distribution is discrete (counts like 0,1,2,…) while the normal distribution is continuous. The continuity correction adjusts for this mismatch by shifting boundaries by 0.5 units.

Definitions
Continuity correction
An adjustment applied when using the normal distribution to approximate a discrete binomial probability, shifting each boundary by 0.5.
  • For P(X≤k), use P(X≤k+0.5)
  • For P(X<k), use P(X≤k−0.5)
  • For P(X≥k), use P(X≥k−0.5)
  • For P(X>k), use P(X≥k+0.5)
  • For P(X=k), use P(k−0.5≤X≤k+0.5)

Practice problem

Example 3:

The census confirms that 13% of people are left-handed. In a sample of 100 people, what is the probability that at least 17 are left-handed?

With the continuity correction (more accurate):

Since we want P(X≥17), apply the correction and use X≥16.5, which converts to p^​=0.165:

zP​=1000.13(0.87)​​0.165−0.13​≈1.04≈0.149​

Without the continuity correction (less accurate):

zP​=1000.13(0.87)​​0.17−0.13​≈1.19≈0.117​

Solution:

(spoiler)

Using the continuity correction, the probability that at least 17 out of 100 people are left-handed is approximately 14.9%. Without the correction, the estimate is approximately 11.7%. The continuity correction gives the more accurate result.

Sample proportions

  • Measure proportion of successes in a sample
  • Success: individual has characteristic; Failure: does not
  • Used to estimate population proportion

Binomial setting & sampling distribution of p^​

  • Mean number of successes: np
  • Standard deviation (count): np(1−p)​
  • Sampling distribution of p^​:
    • Approximately normal if np≥10 and n(1−p)≥10
    • Mean: μp^​​=p
    • Standard deviation: σp^​​=np(1−p)​​

Comparing two population proportions

  • Compare p^​1​ and p^​2​ from two groups
  • Sampling distribution of p^​1​−p^​2​ is approximately normal
    • Mean: p1​−p2​
    • Standard deviation (standard error): n1​p1​(1−p1​)​+n2​p2​(1−p2​)​​

Normal approximation & continuity correction

  • Binomial: discrete; Normal: continuous
  • Continuity correction: adjust boundaries by 0.5 units when approximating binomial with normal
    • P(X≤k)→P(X≤k+0.5)
    • P(X≥k)→P(X≥k−0.5)
    • P(X=k)→P(k−0.5≤X≤k+0.5)

Key conditions & reminders

  • Sampling distribution of p^​ is normal if:
    • np≥10 and n(1−p)≥10
    • Observations are independent and sample is random
  • Use continuity correction for more accurate normal approximations of binomial probabilities

Sign up for free to take 5 quiz questions on this topic

Previous
Next  | 5.5 Sample means
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Sample proportions

Sampling distribution of sample proportions

When you work with sample proportions, you’re measuring the proportion of successes in a sample.

Definitions
Success
An outcome where the individual has the characteristic being studied.
Failure
An outcome where the individual does not have the characteristic being studied.

For example, if the question is “What proportion of high school students have at least one cat?”, then a success is a student who has at least one cat, and a failure is a student who has no cats. The population is split into people who have the characteristic and people who don’t.

If you want to estimate a population proportion using a single sample proportion, it helps to understand how sample proportions typically vary from sample to sample.

Recall the binomial setting:

  • np is the mean number of successes.
  • np(1−p)​ is the standard deviation of the number of successes.
  • Large values of n are needed for the binomial distribution to be well-approximated by a normal distribution.

Proportion rather than count

Here, we care about the proportion of successes rather than the count. The idea is:

  1. Start with a population where the true success proportion is p.
  2. Consider all possible samples of size n.
  3. Compute the sample proportion p^​ for each sample.
Sidenote
Important to know!
  1. The set of all sample proportions is approximately normally distributed.
  2. The mean of the sampling distribution, μp^​​, equals the population proportion p. That is, μp^​​=p.
  3. The standard deviation of the sampling distribution is approximately:

σp^​​=np(1−p)​​

Overall, the sampling distribution of p^​ is approximately normal with mean p and standard deviation np(1−p)​​, as long as:

  • np≥10
  • n(1−p)≥10

Where n is the sample size and p is the probability of one success.

Practice problem

Example 1:

It is estimated that 30% of people will experience cancer in their lifetime. In a random sample of 150 people, what is the probability that less than 50 of them will experience cancer in their lifetime?

First, check the normal-approximation conditions np≥10 and n(1−p)≥10, where n=150 and p=0.3. In this context, a “success” means a person experiences cancer in their lifetime.

npn(1−p)​=150×0.3=45≥10✓=150×0.7=105≥10✓​

The sampling distribution of p^​ is approximately normal. Next, compute the standard deviation:

σp^​​​=np(1−p)​​=1500.3(0.7)​​=0.0014​≈0.0374​

The event “less than 50 out of 150” converts to a sample proportion:

p^​<15050​=0.33

Now compute the probability using a z-score:

P(p^​<0.33)​=P(z<0.03740.33−0.3​)=P(z<0.802)=0.7887​

Solution:

(spoiler)

The probability that fewer than 50 of the 150 people sampled will experience cancer is about 78.87%. If you repeatedly took many random samples of 150 people, about 78.87% of those samples would have fewer than 50 people who experience cancer in their lifetime.

Comparing two proportions

There are many real-world situations where you compare two population proportions.

For example:

  • Is the proportion of parents satisfied with public school education greater than the proportion satisfied with private school education?
  • How does the proportion of dentists who recommend toothbrush brand “A” compare to the proportion who recommend brand “B”?

In these settings, individuals might fall into different categories — a dentist might recommend only “A”, only “B”, both, or neither. The key question is whether an observed difference in sample proportions is large enough to be meaningful, or whether it can be explained by natural sample-to-sample variation.

The set of all differences of sample proportions is approximately normally distributed.

To compare sampling distributions of sample proportions:

  1. Start with two populations with proportions p1​ and p2​. Take samples of sizes n1​ and n2​.
  2. Compute the difference p^​1​−p^​2​ for each pair of samples.
  3. The mean of the sampling distribution of differences is p1​−p2​.
  4. The standard deviation (also the standard error) is:

σp^​1​−p^​2​​=n1​p1​(1−p1​)​+n2​p2​(1−p2​)​​

Practice problem

Example 2:

A researcher is testing whether a new study method improves test performance among students. He randomly assigns students to one of two groups: Group A uses the new study method and Group B uses the old study method. At the end of the term, 33 out of 80 students in Group A passed the final exam, while 52 out of 130 students in Group B passed. What is the probability that the observed difference in passing rates is at least 10%, assuming there is no actual difference between the two methods?

First, define and compute the sample proportions:

p^​1​p^​2​​=8033​=0.4125(Group A, new method)=13052​=0.4(Group B, old method)​

Assume the null hypothesis is true — that there is no real difference in population passing rates, so any observed difference is due to sampling variation:

H0​:p1​=p2​

Compute the standard error:

SE​=n1​p1​(1−p1​)​+n2​p2​(1−p2​)​​=800.4125(0.5875)​+1300.4(0.6)​​=800.242​+1300.24​​≈0.0698​

Now find the probability that the difference is at least 10%:

P(p^​1​−p^​2​≥0.10)​=P(Z≥0.06980.10−0.0125​)=P(Z≥1.2536)≈0.1056​

Solution:

(spoiler)

There is about a 10.56% chance of observing a difference of 10% or greater in passing rates due to natural sampling variation alone, assuming the two study methods are equally effective.

Continuity correction

When using the normal distribution to approximate binomial probabilities, it’s important to remember that the binomial distribution is discrete (counts like 0,1,2,…) while the normal distribution is continuous. The continuity correction adjusts for this mismatch by shifting boundaries by 0.5 units.

Definitions
Continuity correction
An adjustment applied when using the normal distribution to approximate a discrete binomial probability, shifting each boundary by 0.5.
  • For P(X≤k), use P(X≤k+0.5)
  • For P(X<k), use P(X≤k−0.5)
  • For P(X≥k), use P(X≥k−0.5)
  • For P(X>k), use P(X≥k+0.5)
  • For P(X=k), use P(k−0.5≤X≤k+0.5)

Practice problem

Example 3:

The census confirms that 13% of people are left-handed. In a sample of 100 people, what is the probability that at least 17 are left-handed?

With the continuity correction (more accurate):

Since we want P(X≥17), apply the correction and use X≥16.5, which converts to p^​=0.165:

zP​=1000.13(0.87)​​0.165−0.13​≈1.04≈0.149​

Without the continuity correction (less accurate):

zP​=1000.13(0.87)​​0.17−0.13​≈1.19≈0.117​

Solution:

(spoiler)

Using the continuity correction, the probability that at least 17 out of 100 people are left-handed is approximately 14.9%. Without the correction, the estimate is approximately 11.7%. The continuity correction gives the more accurate result.

Key points

Sample proportions

  • Measure proportion of successes in a sample
  • Success: individual has characteristic; Failure: does not
  • Used to estimate population proportion

Binomial setting & sampling distribution of p^​

  • Mean number of successes: np
  • Standard deviation (count): np(1−p)​
  • Sampling distribution of p^​:
    • Approximately normal if np≥10 and n(1−p)≥10
    • Mean: μp^​​=p
    • Standard deviation: σp^​​=np(1−p)​​

Comparing two population proportions

  • Compare p^​1​ and p^​2​ from two groups
  • Sampling distribution of p^​1​−p^​2​ is approximately normal
    • Mean: p1​−p2​
    • Standard deviation (standard error): n1​p1​(1−p1​)​+n2​p2​(1−p2​)​​

Normal approximation & continuity correction

  • Binomial: discrete; Normal: continuous
  • Continuity correction: adjust boundaries by 0.5 units when approximating binomial with normal
    • P(X≤k)→P(X≤k+0.5)
    • P(X≥k)→P(X≥k−0.5)
    • P(X=k)→P(k−0.5≤X≤k+0.5)

Key conditions & reminders

  • Sampling distribution of p^​ is normal if:
    • np≥10 and n(1−p)≥10
    • Observations are independent and sample is random
  • Use continuity correction for more accurate normal approximations of binomial probabilities

More from Sampling distributions

  • Calculations for the normal distribution
  • Central limit theorem
  • Biased and unbiased estimators
  • Sample means
  • Sampling distribution simulations