Sample proportions
Sampling distribution of sample proportions
When you work with sample proportions, you’re measuring the proportion of successes in a sample.
For example, if the question is “What proportion of high school students have at least one cat?”, then a success is a student who has at least one cat, and a failure is a student who has no cats. The population is split into people who have the characteristic and people who don’t.
If you want to estimate a population proportion using a single sample proportion, it helps to understand how sample proportions typically vary from sample to sample.
Proportion rather than count
Here, we care about the proportion of successes rather than the count. The idea is:
- Start with a population where the true success proportion is .
- Consider all possible samples of size .
- Compute the sample proportion for each sample.
Practice problem
Example 1:
It is estimated that of people will experience cancer in their lifetime. In a random sample of people, what is the probability that less than of them will experience cancer in their lifetime?
First, check the normal-approximation conditions and , where and . In this context, a “success” means a person experiences cancer in their lifetime.
The sampling distribution of is approximately normal. Next, compute the standard deviation:
The event “less than out of ” converts to a sample proportion:
Now compute the probability using a z-score:
Solution:
The probability that fewer than of the people sampled will experience cancer is about . If you repeatedly took many random samples of people, about of those samples would have fewer than people who experience cancer in their lifetime.
Comparing two proportions
There are many real-world situations where you compare two population proportions.
For example:
- Is the proportion of parents satisfied with public school education greater than the proportion satisfied with private school education?
- How does the proportion of dentists who recommend toothbrush brand “A” compare to the proportion who recommend brand “B”?
In these settings, individuals might fall into different categories — a dentist might recommend only “A”, only “B”, both, or neither. The key question is whether an observed difference in sample proportions is large enough to be meaningful, or whether it can be explained by natural sample-to-sample variation.
Practice problem
Example 2:
A researcher is testing whether a new study method improves test performance among students. He randomly assigns students to one of two groups: Group A uses the new study method and Group B uses the old study method. At the end of the term, out of students in Group A passed the final exam, while out of students in Group B passed. What is the probability that the observed difference in passing rates is at least , assuming there is no actual difference between the two methods?
First, define and compute the sample proportions:
Assume the null hypothesis is true — that there is no real difference in population passing rates, so any observed difference is due to sampling variation:
Compute the standard error:
Now find the probability that the difference is at least :
Solution:
There is about a chance of observing a difference of or greater in passing rates due to natural sampling variation alone, assuming the two study methods are equally effective.
Continuity correction
When using the normal distribution to approximate binomial probabilities, it’s important to remember that the binomial distribution is discrete (counts like ) while the normal distribution is continuous. The continuity correction adjusts for this mismatch by shifting boundaries by units.
Practice problem
Example 3:
The census confirms that of people are left-handed. In a sample of people, what is the probability that at least are left-handed?
With the continuity correction (more accurate):
Since we want , apply the correction and use , which converts to :
Without the continuity correction (less accurate):
Solution:
Using the continuity correction, the probability that at least out of people are left-handed is approximately . Without the correction, the estimate is approximately . The continuity correction gives the more accurate result.