Estimate
This strategy (along with the other two in this unit) is best treated as a backup plan. Almost no AMC problems are meant to be solved by estimation alone. Still, estimation and related shortcuts can help you reach the correct answer when an exact solution feels out of reach or when you’re short on time.
AMC problems are also written with the expectation that test takers will use basic logic to eliminate impossible choices. For example, if a problem asks for the area of a shape inside another shape, the answer choices will rarely include values that are equal to or larger than the area of the outer shape - those can be eliminated immediately. Beyond these obvious checks, you can often use slightly more careful estimation to narrow the choices further.
Because calculators aren’t allowed, comparing answer choices that involve radicals, , or fractions can feel awkward. This is where number sense matters. One helpful fact is that AMC answer choices are always listed in increasing order, even when they’re written in different forms. So it often helps to convert each choice into a rough decimal estimate so you can compare everything on the same scale.
Common approximations
Memorize these constants and commonly used rough estimates. You should also be able to determine the decimal values of common fractions.
Estimation vs. elimination
Estimation and elimination are related, but they’re not the same tool.
-
Estimation means you approximate the value you’re looking for and place it in a reasonable range on the number line. Once you have a plausible range, you guess among the choices that fall in (or near) that range.
-
Elimination means you cross out choices because they violate a specific requirement of the problem, not because they’re “too far” from an estimate. For example, you might eliminate all odd numbers for an arithmetic reason, or eliminate all choices that aren’t perfect cubes for a geometry reason.
Examples
For these AMC questions, try estimating without doing a full exact solution. Your goal is to get a rough value (or range), then compare it to the answer choices.
Example: The question below is from 2025 AMC 8
In the figure below, is a rectangle with sides of length inches and = inches. Rectangle is rotated clockwise around the midpoint of side to give a second rectangle. What is the total area, in square inches, covered by the two overlapping rectangles?
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Answer: D.
Although this question is relatively simple to solve directly, you can also estimate it quickly.
- The area of one rectangle is .
- The total covered area is the area of one rectangle plus the part of the rotated rectangle that sticks out beyond the overlap.
- From the diagram, that “extra” part looks a little more than half of the rectangle’s area (the unshaded region is about half the rectangle plus a thin sliver).
So the total should be a little more than . That eliminates A and B immediately, leaving C and D as the most reasonable choices.
Example: The question below is from 2019 AMC 10B
The figure below shows a square and four equilateral triangles, with each triangle having a side lying on a side of the square, such that each triangle has side length and the third vertices of the triangles meet at the center of the square. The region inside the square but outside the triangles is shaded. What is the area of the shaded region?
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Answer: B.
Start with a size estimate.
- The square’s side length must be slightly less than , so the square’s area is less than .
- From the picture, the shaded region looks a bit less than half of the square.
That suggests the shaded area is less than , and plausibly somewhere around to .
- Choice A is , which looks too small.
- Choice E is greater than , which looks too large.
So B, C, and D are the only reasonable candidates by estimation. You can still solve the problem exactly, but this kind of estimate is useful when time is tight or when you want a quick reasonableness check on an exact computation.