This browser is too old to run Achievable.

Update it, or open this page in a current version of Chrome, Safari, Firefox or Edge. On an iPhone or iPad, update iOS: every browser there runs on the version of Safari that comes with it.

Achievable logoAchievable logo
Property & Casualty
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Resources
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
1. General Insurance Concepts
2. P&C Insurance Basics
3. Underwriting
4. Claims Settlement
5. Dwelling Policies (DP)
6. Dwelling Policy Conditions
7. Home Owners Policies (HO)
8. Homeowners Policy Definitions and Conditions
9. Endorsements and Scheduled Property
10. Personal Auto Insurance (PAP)
11. Flood and Other Limited Policies
12. Commercial Package Policy (CPP)
13. Commercial Property Forms
14. Cause of Loss Forms and Commercial Property Endorsements
15. Commercial Crime Insurance
16. Commercial General Liability (CGL)
17. Commercial Auto Insurance
18. Ocean and Inland Marine Insurance
19. Equipment Breakdown and Farm Coverage
20. Professional Liability
21. Business Owners Policy (BOP)
22. Businessowners Policy: Section II Liability
23. Workers Compensation Insurance
Bonding
Achievable logoAchievable logo
Not found
Achievable Property & Casualty
41. Iowa Insurance Regulations
41.3. Iowa Unfair Practices, the Insurance Fraud Act, and Producer Responsibilities

Iowa Unfair Trade Practices and Claims Practices

9 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

The Iowa Unfair Trade Practices Act (Iowa Code Chapter 507B)

Iowa’s central trade practices statute is Iowa Code Chapter 507B, which defines and prohibits specific unfair or deceptive insurance practices. It applies to insurers and producers alike. Violations can trigger administrative penalties under Iowa Code 505.7A and 507B.7, license suspension or revocation under Iowa Code 522B.11, cease-and-desist orders under Iowa Code 507B.6A, civil liability, and — in serious cases — criminal prosecution.

Misrepresentation (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(a)(1)–(10))

Iowa’s misrepresentation prohibition is broad. Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(a) makes it an unfair practice to make or circulate any estimate, illustration, statement, sales presentation, omission or comparison that misrepresents in any of the ways it lists; the statute requires no proof that the person knew the statement was false or meant to deceive. Among them:

  • Misrepresenting the benefits, advantages, conditions, or terms of any insurance policy.
  • Misrepresenting the dividends or share of surplus to be received on a policy.
  • Making false or misleading statements about dividends or share of surplus previously paid on policies.
  • Misrepresenting the financial condition of an insurer or the legal reserve system.
  • Using a name or title that misrepresents the true nature of a policy or class of policies.
  • Misrepresenting the policy as a share of stock.
  • Using untrue or misleading statements in connection with a policy’s sale, conversion, or replacement.
  • Misrepresentation by omission — leaving out information the consumer would need to make an informed decision.
  • Misrepresenting to induce a lapse, forfeiture, exchange, conversion, or surrender of a policy, or to effect a pledge, assignment of, or loan against a policy.
  • A misrepresentation, including an intentional misquote of the premium rate, made to induce the purchase of a policy.
Sidenote
EXAM FOCUS — Misrepresentation by silence

You do not have to say something false to commit misrepresentation under Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(a). Omitting a material fact — a policy limitation, an exclusion, a separate deductible — that the client needed to make an informed decision is itself a violation. The exam likes scenarios where the producer never tells a literal lie but leaves out a critical detail.

False Information and Advertising (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(b)(1); Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.3)

Iowa prohibits any false, deceptive, or misleading information about an insurer or its policies, whether published or circulated. Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.3 provides detailed advertising standards:

  • Identification. Advertising must clearly identify the insurer.
  • Truthfulness. Statements about policy benefits must be accurate and not misleading.
  • Limitations. Information about exceptions, limitations and reductions must not be minimized, obscured or presented ambiguously, and words describing exclusions, limitations, exceptions and reductions must clearly, prominently and accurately show their negative or limited nature (Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.3(1), (4)).
  • Comparisons. Comparisons with other policies or insurers must be fair and complete.
  • Testimonials and endorsements. Must be genuine, must not be paid for in a way that creates an undisclosed bias, and must include any required disclosures.

Twisting

Twisting is the act of inducing a policyholder to lapse, surrender, exchange, or replace an existing policy or annuity in order to buy another, when doing so would operate to the policyholder’s overall detriment (Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.2); Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.7 prohibits it. The replacement itself is not the violation; inducing a replacement that works against the policyholder’s interests is. A legitimate replacement, fully and honestly disclosed, is permitted.

Churning

Churning is an industry term for replacing a client’s policy with another policy issued by the same insurer, primarily to generate fresh first-year commission rather than to benefit the client. Iowa’s twisting rule reaches it, because the rule does not depend on which insurer issues the new policy.

MEMORY HOOK — Twisting vs. churning

In Iowa, twisting is inducing a replacement that works against the client, whether the new policy comes from another carrier or the same one; churning is the industry name for the same-company version. Honest, well-disclosed replacement that serves the client is neither.

Rebating (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(i))

Rebating means giving — or offering to give — a prospective or current policyholder any rebate of premium, or any valuable consideration or inducement not specified in the contract, as an inducement to buy insurance (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(i)). The classic example is a producer who offers to return part of the first-year commission. Less obvious examples count too:

  • Splitting commission with a client by check, cash, or transfer.
  • Giving a non-trivial gift (a high-value gift card, expensive meal, event tickets) as an inducement.
  • Promising future services unrelated to the policy as a reason to buy.
  • Offering a discount, refund, or premium rebate not contained in the contract itself.

Two things are not rebating, even though they sometimes look like it:

  • Dividends on a participating (mutual) policy — a return of premium when the insurer’s results are better than expected.
  • Discounts the contract itself specifies or, for lines other than life, annuities, and accident and health, that an applicable rate filing provides (group rates, multi-policy discounts, payroll deduction credits).
Sidenote
PITFALL — Who can be sanctioned

Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(i) reaches whoever gives or offers a rebate, and for insurance other than life, annuities and accident and health, an insured who knowingly receives or accepts one also violates the law (507B.4(3)(i)(3)(a)). “But the client asked for it” is not a defense.

Defamation (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(c))

Making or circulating a statement that is false, or maliciously critical of or derogatory to the financial condition of any person, and that is calculated to injure that person, is defamation under Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(c).

Boycott, Coercion, and Intimidation (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(d))

Iowa prohibits entering into an agreement to commit, or acting in concert to commit, any act of boycott, coercion, or intimidation that results or tends to result in unreasonable restraint of, or monopoly in, the business of insurance. The classic fact pattern is a group of insurers or producers agreeing to withhold business from a broker unless the broker stops placing certain accounts.

Unfair Discrimination (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(g)(2)–(3); Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.11)

Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(g) prohibits unfair discrimination. In property and casualty insurance it reaches two contexts:

  • Insurance other than life. Unfair discrimination between insureds of the same class for essentially the same hazard, in the premium, fees or rates charged, the benefits payable, or the terms of the contract (507B.4(3)(g)(2)).
  • Domestic or sexual abuse. Any discrimination in the sale of insurance solely on the basis of domestic abuse or sexual abuse (507B.4(3)(g)(3)).

Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.11 prohibits denying or restricting coverage based solely on sex or marital status; physical or mental impairment, including blindness, unless based on sound actuarial principles or actual or reasonably anticipated experience; or being a victim of domestic abuse.

CORE IDEA — Insurance has to discriminate by risk to function — “unfair” is the question

Insurance pricing differentiates by risk by design. The legal question is whether the distinction is actuarially justified and applied to a permissible characteristic. A frame house that presents a greater fire hazard paying more than an otherwise similar brick house is not unfair discrimination; charging two homeowners of the same class, who present essentially the same hazard, different premiums is (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(g)(2)).

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(j)(1)–(15))

Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(j) lists specific claims practices that are unfair when committed or performed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. Highlights:

  • (1) Misrepresenting policy provisions in connection with a claim.
  • (2) Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications about claims.
  • (3) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims.
  • (4) Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation.
  • (5) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss has been completed.
  • (6) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear.
  • (7) Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under a policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered.
  • (8) Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a reasonable person would have believed the insured was entitled, based on advertising materials accompanying or made part of an application.
  • (9) Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application that was altered without notice to or knowledge or consent of the insured.
  • (10) Making claim payments not accompanied by a statement explaining the coverage under which payments are being made.
  • (11) Making known a policy of appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants, to compel them to accept less than the amount awarded.
  • (12) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring a preliminary claim report and then formal proof of loss forms that contain substantially the same information.
  • (13) Failing to promptly settle claims, where liability has become reasonably clear, under one portion of policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions.
  • (14) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation of the basis in the policy, the facts or the law for denying a claim or offering a compromise settlement.
  • (15) Failing to comply with the Commissioner’s procedures for auditing claims submitted by health care providers (this item does not apply to liability, workers’ compensation, auto or homeowners medical payments, disability income or long-term care insurance).

Iowa Unfair Trade Practices Act (Chapter 507B) — Overview

  • Core statute defining/prohibiting unfair & deceptive insurance practices
  • Applies to insurers and producers alike
  • Violations can trigger: admin penalties (505.7A, 507B.7), license action (522B.11), cease-and-desist (507B.6A), civil liability, criminal prosecution

Misrepresentation (507B.4(3)(a)(1)–(10))

  • Broad prohibition: no proof of knowledge or intent to deceive required
  • Covers false/misleading statements on: policy benefits/terms, dividends, insurer financial condition, policy names, treating policy as stock
  • Misrepresentation by omission counts — leaving out material facts (limitations, exclusions, separate deductibles) is a violation
  • Includes inducing lapse/surrender/exchange via misrepresentation, and intentional premium misquotes

False Information & Advertising (507B.4(3)(b)(1); Rule 191-15.3)

  • Prohibits false/deceptive/misleading info about insurer or policies
  • Advertising standards: clear insurer identification, truthful benefit statements, fair/complete comparisons
  • Testimonials/endorsements must be genuine, unbiased, properly disclosed

Twisting

  • Inducing lapse/surrender/exchange/replacement that is detrimental to policyholder overall (Rule 191-15.2; prohibited by 191-15.7)
  • Replacement itself is not the violation — the detrimental inducement is
  • Honest, fully disclosed replacement is permitted

Churning

  • Same-insurer version of twisting — replacing policy with another from same company mainly for new commission
  • Iowa’s twisting rule applies regardless of which insurer issues new policy
  • Memory hook: twisting = any carrier; churning = same carrier; both bad if client harmed, legitimate replacement is neither

Rebating (507B.4(3)(i))

  • Giving/offering rebate of premium or unspecified valuable consideration as inducement to buy
  • Examples: splitting commission, non-trivial gifts, unrelated future service promises, undisclosed discounts
  • Not rebating: dividends on participating policies; discounts specified in contract or allowed by rate filing
  • Insured who knowingly accepts a rebate (non-life/annuity/A&H lines) also violates law — “client asked” is no defense

Defamation (507B.4(3)(c))

  • False or maliciously derogatory statements about another’s financial condition, intended to injure
  • Often paired with unfair comparison concept against competitors

Boycott, Coercion, and Intimidation (507B.4(3)(d))

  • Prohibits agreements/concerted acts of boycott, coercion, or intimidation causing unreasonable restraint or monopoly
  • Example: insurers/producers colluding to withhold business from a broker

Unfair Discrimination (507B.4(3)(g)(2)–(3); Rule 191-15.11)

  • Non-life insurance: no unfair discrimination among same-class/hazard insureds in rates, benefits, terms
  • No discrimination based solely on domestic/sexual abuse status
  • Rule 191-15.11 also bars discrimination by sex, marital status, impairment (unless actuarially justified), or domestic abuse victim status
  • Core idea: risk-based pricing is lawful; discrimination on impermissible/non-actuarial characteristics is not

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices (507B.4(3)(j)(1)–(15))

  • Applies when practices occur with frequency indicating a general business practice
  • Key prohibited acts: misrepresenting policy provisions; failing to promptly acknowledge/investigate/pay claims; not settling in good faith when liability is clear; lowballing to force litigation; altering applications without consent; failing to explain claim payments or denials; using arbitration appeals to pressure insureds; redundant proof-of-loss delays; withholding one coverage portion to influence another
  • Special rule: compliance with Commissioner’s claim-audit procedures for health care providers (excludes liability, workers’ comp, auto/home medical payments, disability income, LTC)

Sign up for free to take 7 quiz questions on this topic

Previous
Next  | 41.3.2 Iowa Insurance Fraud and Producer Responsibilities
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Iowa Unfair Trade Practices and Claims Practices

The Iowa Unfair Trade Practices Act (Iowa Code Chapter 507B)

Iowa’s central trade practices statute is Iowa Code Chapter 507B, which defines and prohibits specific unfair or deceptive insurance practices. It applies to insurers and producers alike. Violations can trigger administrative penalties under Iowa Code 505.7A and 507B.7, license suspension or revocation under Iowa Code 522B.11, cease-and-desist orders under Iowa Code 507B.6A, civil liability, and — in serious cases — criminal prosecution.

Misrepresentation (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(a)(1)–(10))

Iowa’s misrepresentation prohibition is broad. Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(a) makes it an unfair practice to make or circulate any estimate, illustration, statement, sales presentation, omission or comparison that misrepresents in any of the ways it lists; the statute requires no proof that the person knew the statement was false or meant to deceive. Among them:

  • Misrepresenting the benefits, advantages, conditions, or terms of any insurance policy.
  • Misrepresenting the dividends or share of surplus to be received on a policy.
  • Making false or misleading statements about dividends or share of surplus previously paid on policies.
  • Misrepresenting the financial condition of an insurer or the legal reserve system.
  • Using a name or title that misrepresents the true nature of a policy or class of policies.
  • Misrepresenting the policy as a share of stock.
  • Using untrue or misleading statements in connection with a policy’s sale, conversion, or replacement.
  • Misrepresentation by omission — leaving out information the consumer would need to make an informed decision.
  • Misrepresenting to induce a lapse, forfeiture, exchange, conversion, or surrender of a policy, or to effect a pledge, assignment of, or loan against a policy.
  • A misrepresentation, including an intentional misquote of the premium rate, made to induce the purchase of a policy.
Sidenote
EXAM FOCUS — Misrepresentation by silence

You do not have to say something false to commit misrepresentation under Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(a). Omitting a material fact — a policy limitation, an exclusion, a separate deductible — that the client needed to make an informed decision is itself a violation. The exam likes scenarios where the producer never tells a literal lie but leaves out a critical detail.

False Information and Advertising (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(b)(1); Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.3)

Iowa prohibits any false, deceptive, or misleading information about an insurer or its policies, whether published or circulated. Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.3 provides detailed advertising standards:

  • Identification. Advertising must clearly identify the insurer.
  • Truthfulness. Statements about policy benefits must be accurate and not misleading.
  • Limitations. Information about exceptions, limitations and reductions must not be minimized, obscured or presented ambiguously, and words describing exclusions, limitations, exceptions and reductions must clearly, prominently and accurately show their negative or limited nature (Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.3(1), (4)).
  • Comparisons. Comparisons with other policies or insurers must be fair and complete.
  • Testimonials and endorsements. Must be genuine, must not be paid for in a way that creates an undisclosed bias, and must include any required disclosures.

Twisting

Twisting is the act of inducing a policyholder to lapse, surrender, exchange, or replace an existing policy or annuity in order to buy another, when doing so would operate to the policyholder’s overall detriment (Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.2); Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.7 prohibits it. The replacement itself is not the violation; inducing a replacement that works against the policyholder’s interests is. A legitimate replacement, fully and honestly disclosed, is permitted.

Churning

Churning is an industry term for replacing a client’s policy with another policy issued by the same insurer, primarily to generate fresh first-year commission rather than to benefit the client. Iowa’s twisting rule reaches it, because the rule does not depend on which insurer issues the new policy.

MEMORY HOOK — Twisting vs. churning

In Iowa, twisting is inducing a replacement that works against the client, whether the new policy comes from another carrier or the same one; churning is the industry name for the same-company version. Honest, well-disclosed replacement that serves the client is neither.

Rebating (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(i))

Rebating means giving — or offering to give — a prospective or current policyholder any rebate of premium, or any valuable consideration or inducement not specified in the contract, as an inducement to buy insurance (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(i)). The classic example is a producer who offers to return part of the first-year commission. Less obvious examples count too:

  • Splitting commission with a client by check, cash, or transfer.
  • Giving a non-trivial gift (a high-value gift card, expensive meal, event tickets) as an inducement.
  • Promising future services unrelated to the policy as a reason to buy.
  • Offering a discount, refund, or premium rebate not contained in the contract itself.

Two things are not rebating, even though they sometimes look like it:

  • Dividends on a participating (mutual) policy — a return of premium when the insurer’s results are better than expected.
  • Discounts the contract itself specifies or, for lines other than life, annuities, and accident and health, that an applicable rate filing provides (group rates, multi-policy discounts, payroll deduction credits).
Sidenote
PITFALL — Who can be sanctioned

Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(i) reaches whoever gives or offers a rebate, and for insurance other than life, annuities and accident and health, an insured who knowingly receives or accepts one also violates the law (507B.4(3)(i)(3)(a)). “But the client asked for it” is not a defense.

Defamation (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(c))

Making or circulating a statement that is false, or maliciously critical of or derogatory to the financial condition of any person, and that is calculated to injure that person, is defamation under Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(c).

Boycott, Coercion, and Intimidation (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(d))

Iowa prohibits entering into an agreement to commit, or acting in concert to commit, any act of boycott, coercion, or intimidation that results or tends to result in unreasonable restraint of, or monopoly in, the business of insurance. The classic fact pattern is a group of insurers or producers agreeing to withhold business from a broker unless the broker stops placing certain accounts.

Unfair Discrimination (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(g)(2)–(3); Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.11)

Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(g) prohibits unfair discrimination. In property and casualty insurance it reaches two contexts:

  • Insurance other than life. Unfair discrimination between insureds of the same class for essentially the same hazard, in the premium, fees or rates charged, the benefits payable, or the terms of the contract (507B.4(3)(g)(2)).
  • Domestic or sexual abuse. Any discrimination in the sale of insurance solely on the basis of domestic abuse or sexual abuse (507B.4(3)(g)(3)).

Iowa Admin Rule 191-15.11 prohibits denying or restricting coverage based solely on sex or marital status; physical or mental impairment, including blindness, unless based on sound actuarial principles or actual or reasonably anticipated experience; or being a victim of domestic abuse.

CORE IDEA — Insurance has to discriminate by risk to function — “unfair” is the question

Insurance pricing differentiates by risk by design. The legal question is whether the distinction is actuarially justified and applied to a permissible characteristic. A frame house that presents a greater fire hazard paying more than an otherwise similar brick house is not unfair discrimination; charging two homeowners of the same class, who present essentially the same hazard, different premiums is (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(g)(2)).

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices (Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(j)(1)–(15))

Iowa Code 507B.4(3)(j) lists specific claims practices that are unfair when committed or performed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. Highlights:

  • (1) Misrepresenting policy provisions in connection with a claim.
  • (2) Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications about claims.
  • (3) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims.
  • (4) Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation.
  • (5) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss has been completed.
  • (6) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear.
  • (7) Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under a policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered.
  • (8) Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a reasonable person would have believed the insured was entitled, based on advertising materials accompanying or made part of an application.
  • (9) Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application that was altered without notice to or knowledge or consent of the insured.
  • (10) Making claim payments not accompanied by a statement explaining the coverage under which payments are being made.
  • (11) Making known a policy of appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants, to compel them to accept less than the amount awarded.
  • (12) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring a preliminary claim report and then formal proof of loss forms that contain substantially the same information.
  • (13) Failing to promptly settle claims, where liability has become reasonably clear, under one portion of policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions.
  • (14) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation of the basis in the policy, the facts or the law for denying a claim or offering a compromise settlement.
  • (15) Failing to comply with the Commissioner’s procedures for auditing claims submitted by health care providers (this item does not apply to liability, workers’ compensation, auto or homeowners medical payments, disability income or long-term care insurance).
Key points

Iowa Unfair Trade Practices Act (Chapter 507B) — Overview

  • Core statute defining/prohibiting unfair & deceptive insurance practices
  • Applies to insurers and producers alike
  • Violations can trigger: admin penalties (505.7A, 507B.7), license action (522B.11), cease-and-desist (507B.6A), civil liability, criminal prosecution

Misrepresentation (507B.4(3)(a)(1)–(10))

  • Broad prohibition: no proof of knowledge or intent to deceive required
  • Covers false/misleading statements on: policy benefits/terms, dividends, insurer financial condition, policy names, treating policy as stock
  • Misrepresentation by omission counts — leaving out material facts (limitations, exclusions, separate deductibles) is a violation
  • Includes inducing lapse/surrender/exchange via misrepresentation, and intentional premium misquotes

False Information & Advertising (507B.4(3)(b)(1); Rule 191-15.3)

  • Prohibits false/deceptive/misleading info about insurer or policies
  • Advertising standards: clear insurer identification, truthful benefit statements, fair/complete comparisons
  • Testimonials/endorsements must be genuine, unbiased, properly disclosed

Twisting

  • Inducing lapse/surrender/exchange/replacement that is detrimental to policyholder overall (Rule 191-15.2; prohibited by 191-15.7)
  • Replacement itself is not the violation — the detrimental inducement is
  • Honest, fully disclosed replacement is permitted

Churning

  • Same-insurer version of twisting — replacing policy with another from same company mainly for new commission
  • Iowa’s twisting rule applies regardless of which insurer issues new policy
  • Memory hook: twisting = any carrier; churning = same carrier; both bad if client harmed, legitimate replacement is neither

Rebating (507B.4(3)(i))

  • Giving/offering rebate of premium or unspecified valuable consideration as inducement to buy
  • Examples: splitting commission, non-trivial gifts, unrelated future service promises, undisclosed discounts
  • Not rebating: dividends on participating policies; discounts specified in contract or allowed by rate filing
  • Insured who knowingly accepts a rebate (non-life/annuity/A&H lines) also violates law — “client asked” is no defense

Defamation (507B.4(3)(c))

  • False or maliciously derogatory statements about another’s financial condition, intended to injure
  • Often paired with unfair comparison concept against competitors

Boycott, Coercion, and Intimidation (507B.4(3)(d))

  • Prohibits agreements/concerted acts of boycott, coercion, or intimidation causing unreasonable restraint or monopoly
  • Example: insurers/producers colluding to withhold business from a broker

Unfair Discrimination (507B.4(3)(g)(2)–(3); Rule 191-15.11)

  • Non-life insurance: no unfair discrimination among same-class/hazard insureds in rates, benefits, terms
  • No discrimination based solely on domestic/sexual abuse status
  • Rule 191-15.11 also bars discrimination by sex, marital status, impairment (unless actuarially justified), or domestic abuse victim status
  • Core idea: risk-based pricing is lawful; discrimination on impermissible/non-actuarial characteristics is not

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices (507B.4(3)(j)(1)–(15))

  • Applies when practices occur with frequency indicating a general business practice
  • Key prohibited acts: misrepresenting policy provisions; failing to promptly acknowledge/investigate/pay claims; not settling in good faith when liability is clear; lowballing to force litigation; altering applications without consent; failing to explain claim payments or denials; using arbitration appeals to pressure insureds; redundant proof-of-loss delays; withholding one coverage portion to influence another
  • Special rule: compliance with Commissioner’s claim-audit procedures for health care providers (excludes liability, workers’ comp, auto/home medical payments, disability income, LTC)

More from Iowa Unfair Practices, the Insurance Fraud Act, and Producer Responsibilities

  • Iowa Insurance Fraud and Producer Responsibilities