Designing an aerobic training program involves applying core principles of exercise science particularly, specificity and overload, to improve the respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems. Effective aerobic endurance programs challenge these systems beyond their accustomed level using key variables like exercise mode, frequency, duration, and intensity.
To minimize fatigue and overtraining while maximizing adaptations, a sound program must consider factors such as:
Maximal aerobic capacity ()
Lactate threshold
Exercise economy
is the maximum rate of oxygen consumption and is a key predictor of endurance performance.
High is necessary but not sufficient—athletes must also develop lactate threshold and exercise economy.
Even highly trained individuals may benefit from further improvements, especially when tailored to individual physiology.
The point at which blood lactate accumulates rapidly is a stronger predictor of performance than .
Training should elevate the lactate threshold to allow for higher intensity efforts with less fatigue.
Refers to the energy cost at a given velocity.
Influenced by biomechanics, technique, body composition, and environmental conditions.
Improved economy = greater efficiency and better performance.
An effective program must be specific to the athlete and involves manipulation of five primary design variables:
Aerobic Training Program Design Variables
Exercise mode: Select activities that mimic competition (e.g., running, swimming).
Training frequency: Refers to how often training occurs (days/week).
Training intensity: Determines physiological adaptations; can be regulated via heart rate or RPE.
Exercise duration: Influenced by intensity; higher intensity allows shorter sessions.
Exercise progression: Gradual increase in frequency, duration, or intensity over time.
| % | % HRR | % MHR |
| 50 | 50 | 66 |
| 55 | 55 | 70 |
| 60 | 60 | 74 |
| 65 | 65 | 77 |
| 70 | 70 | 80 |
| 75 | 75 | 85 |
| 80 | 80 | 89 |
| 85 | 85 | 92 |
| 90 | 90 | 96 |
| 95 | 95 | 98 |
| 100 | 100 | 100 |
HRR: Heart rate reserve
MHR: Maximal heart rate
Karvonen Method (Heart Rate Reserve Method) formula:
APMHR = 220 − age
HRR = APMHR − RHR
THR = (HRR × exercise intensity) + RHR
APMHR: Age-predicted maximal heart rate
THR: Target heart rate
Example: 30-year-old with RHR = 60 bpm, intensity = 60–70%
APMHR = 220 − 30 = 190
HRR = 190 − 60 = 130
THRR = 138–151 bpm (23–25 beats per 10 seconds)
THRR: Target heart rate range
Percentage of Maximal Heart Rate Method formula:
APMHR = 220 − age
THR = APMHR × intensity
Example: 20-year-old, intensity = 70–85%
APMHR = 200
THRR = 140–170 bpm (23–28 beats per 10 seconds)
| Rating | Description |
| 1 | Nothing at all (lying down) |
| 2 | Extremely little |
| 3 | Very easy |
| 4 | Easy (could do this all day) |
| 5 | Moderate |
| 6 | Somewhat hard |
| 7 | Hard |
| 8 | Very hard (making an effort to keep up) |
| 9 | Very, very hard |
| 10 | Maximum effort (can’t go any further) |
1 MET = 3.5 ml/kg/min of oxygen consumption.
METs can be used to quantify intensity of exercise based on oxygen use.
| METs | Activity |
| 1.0 | Lying down or sitting quietly |
| 2.5 | Walking 2 mph (3.2 km/h) on level surface |
| 5.0 | Elliptical trainer, moderate effort |
| 7.0 | Rowing, stationary, moderate effort |
| 8.0 | Circuit training (minimal rest) |
| 10.0 | Running 6 mph (10 min/mile pace) |
| 11.0 | Running 7 mph (8.5 min/mile) |
| 12.8 | Running 9 mph (6.6 min/mile) |
| 15.8 | Cycling 20 mph (32.2 km/h) |
Refers to the length of the session.
Longer duration = lower intensity; shorter duration = higher intensity.
Aerobic sessions can last 20–120+ minutes depending on intensity and goal.
Needed to maintain or improve performance.
Progress one variable (frequency, intensity, or duration) by ≤10% per week.
Use examples of training blocks to structure progression.
Example A (Moderate THR):
Example B (Lower THR):
Sign up for free to take 15 quiz questions on this topic