Allocation of service department costs: reciprocal method
Reciprocal method of allocation
The reciprocal method (also known as the algebraic method) provides the most accurate service department allocation technique by fully recognizing mutual services between service departments. Unlike the direct and step-down methods, which either ignore or partially account for inter-service support, the reciprocal method treats all service departments as both providers and receivers of services until all costs are allocated to operating departments.
How it works
The method involves setting up and solving simultaneous equations to reflect the reciprocal services. Once the total adjusted costs of each service department are computed (including the services they receive from each other), the costs are allocated to the operating departments using the usual cost drivers.
Example: Reciprocal allocation of HR and IT costs
Assume a company has the following departments:
Service departments:
- Human Resources (HR): $60,000
- Information Technology (IT): $40,000
Operating departments:
- Department A
- Department B
| Department | Number of employees | Number of computers |
| HR | 10 | 20 |
| IT | 50 | 20 |
| Dept A | 100 | 100 |
| Dept B | 150 | 100 |
Let’s allocate HR costs based on the number of employees and IT costs based on the number of computers.
Step 1: Calculate allocation percentages
HR Cost Allocation (based on employees):
| Recipient dept | Employees | Proportion |
| IT | 50 | 50 / 300 = 16.67% |
| Dept A | 100 | 100 / 300 = 33.33% |
| Dept B | 150 | 150 / 300 = 50.00% |
| Total | 300 | 100% |
The above means that the total to be allocated to the operational departments is the . This will be translated into an equation in the next step.
IT Cost Allocation (based on computers):
| Recipient dept | Computers | Proportion |
| HR | 20 | 20 / 220 = 9.10% |
| Dept A | 100 | 100 / 220 = 45.45% |
| Dept B | 100 | 100 / 220 = 45.45% |
| Total | 220 | 100% |
Note: 20 / 220 actually computes to 9.09%; it’s nudged up to 9.10% here so the three allocation percentages add up to exactly 100%.
The above means that the total to be allocated to the operational departments is the . This will be translated into an equation in the next step.
Step 2: Set up the equations
Let:
From the allocation logic above:
Step 3: Solve the equations
Substitute the first equation (HR) into the second (IT):
Substitute back to solve for HR:
Step 4: Calculate the interdepartment costs
HR (total cost = $64,620) allocated based on employees using the original allocation rates in Step 1:
- To IT: 0.1667 × 64,620 = $10,772
- To Dept A: 0.3333 × 64,620 = $21,538
- To Dept B: 0.5000 × 64,620 = $32,310
IT (total cost = $50,772) allocated based on computers using the original allocation rates in Step 1:
- To HR: 0.0910 × 50,772 = $4,620
- To Dept A: 0.4545 × 50,772 = $23,076
- To Dept B: 0.4545 × 50,772 = $23,076
These reciprocal shares reconcile back to Step 3: IT’s $10,772 share of HR plus the original $40,000 gives IT’s solved total of $50,772, and HR’s $4,620 share of IT plus the original $60,000 gives HR’s solved total of $64,620.
Step 5: Final allocated costs to operating departments
| Department | From HR | From IT | Total |
| Dept A | $21,538 | $23,076 | $44,614 |
| Dept B | $32,310 | $23,076 | $55,386 |
| Total | $100,000 |
The total overhead costs allocated to the operational departments should still be $100,000.
For comparison, the direct method - which ignores HR and IT’s mutual usage entirely - would allocate about $44,000 to Dept A and $56,000 to Dept B from this same data. The reciprocal method shifts roughly $600 from Dept B to Dept A once each service department’s reliance on the other is recognized.
Benefits of the reciprocal method
- Most accurate method for reflecting true cost relationships
- Fully incorporates mutual support between service departments
- Recognizes all inter-service department interactions using mathematical equations
- Provides better cost transparency and basis for pricing or budgeting decisions
Limitations of the reciprocal method
- Mathematically complex; requires solving equations or matrix algebra
- Difficult to implement without software support
- May be impractical for organizations with many service departments