This browser is too old to run Achievable.

Update it, or open this page in a current version of Chrome, Safari, Firefox or Edge. On an iPhone or iPad, update iOS: every browser there runs on the version of Safari that comes with it.

Achievable logoAchievable logo
CMA Part 1
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Resources
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
Introduction
1. External financial reporting decisions
2. Planning, budgeting, and forecasting
3. Performance management
4. Cost management
4.1 Measurement concepts
4.2 Costing systems
4.3 Overhead costs
4.3.1 Overhead classification and cost behavior
4.3.2 Overhead allocation methods
4.3.3 Overapplied and underapplied overhead
4.3.4 Allocation of service department costs: overview
4.3.5 Allocation of service department costs: direct method
4.3.6 Allocation of service department costs: step-down method
4.3.7 Allocation of service department costs: reciprocal method
4.4 Supply chain management
4.5 Business process improvement
5. Internal control
6. Technology and analytics
Wrapping up
Achievable logoAchievable logo
4.3.7 Allocation of service department costs: reciprocal method
Achievable CMA Part 1
4. Cost management
4.3. Overhead costs
Our CMA Part 1 course is currently in development and is a work-in-progress.

Allocation of service department costs: reciprocal method

6 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

Reciprocal method of allocation

The reciprocal method (also known as the algebraic method) provides the most accurate service department allocation technique by fully recognizing mutual services between service departments. Unlike the direct and step-down methods, which either ignore or partially account for inter-service support, the reciprocal method treats all service departments as both providers and receivers of services until all costs are allocated to operating departments.

How it works

The method involves setting up and solving simultaneous equations to reflect the reciprocal services. Once the total adjusted costs of each service department are computed (including the services they receive from each other), the costs are allocated to the operating departments using the usual cost drivers.

Example: Reciprocal allocation of HR and IT costs

Assume a company has the following departments:

Service departments:

  • Human Resources (HR): $60,000
  • Information Technology (IT): $40,000

Operating departments:

  • Department A
  • Department B
Department Number of employees Number of computers
HR 10 20
IT 50 20
Dept A 100 100
Dept B 150 100

Let’s allocate HR costs based on the number of employees and IT costs based on the number of computers.

Watch out: when you compute allocation percentages, exclude the department’s own cost driver count - for example, don’t count IT’s own 20 computers when allocating IT costs. You’re only distributing cost to the departments that actually receive the service, which under the reciprocal method includes the other service department.

Step 1: Calculate allocation percentages

HR Cost Allocation (based on employees):

Recipient dept Employees Proportion
IT 50 50 / 300 = 16.67%
Dept A 100 100 / 300 = 33.33%
Dept B 150 150 / 300 = 50.00%
Total 300 100%

The above means that the total IT cost to be allocated to the operational departments is the $40,000+16.67% of HR costs. This will be translated into an equation in the next step.

IT Cost Allocation (based on computers):

Recipient dept Computers Proportion
HR 20 20 / 220 = 9.10%
Dept A 100 100 / 220 = 45.45%
Dept B 100 100 / 220 = 45.45%
Total 220 100%

Note: 20 / 220 actually computes to 9.09%; it’s nudged up to 9.10% here so the three allocation percentages add up to exactly 100%.

The above means that the total HR cost to be allocated to the operational departments is the $60,000+9.10% of IT costs. This will be translated into an equation in the next step.

Step 2: Set up the equations

Let:

HR=Total cost of HR including IT’s allocation to HR

IT=Total cost of IT including HR’s allocation to IT

From the allocation logic above:

HR=60,000+(9.10%×IT)

IT=40,000+(16.67%×HR)

Step 3: Solve the equations

Substitute the first equation (HR) into the second (IT):

ITITITIT−0.01517 IT0.98483ITIT​=40,000+0.1667(60,000+0.0910 IT)=40,000+(0.1667×60,000)+(0.1667×0.0910 IT)=40,000+10,002+0.01517 IT=50,002=50,002=50,772​

Substitute back to solve for HR:

HR​=60,000+(9.10%×IT)=60,000+(9.10%×50,772)=60,000+4,620=64,620​

Step 4: Calculate the interdepartment costs

HR (total cost = $64,620) allocated based on employees using the original allocation rates in Step 1:

  • To IT: 0.1667 × 64,620 = $10,772
  • To Dept A: 0.3333 × 64,620 = $21,538
  • To Dept B: 0.5000 × 64,620 = $32,310

IT (total cost = $50,772) allocated based on computers using the original allocation rates in Step 1:

  • To HR: 0.0910 × 50,772 = $4,620
  • To Dept A: 0.4545 × 50,772 = $23,076
  • To Dept B: 0.4545 × 50,772 = $23,076

These reciprocal shares reconcile back to Step 3: IT’s $10,772 share of HR plus the original $40,000 gives IT’s solved total of $50,772, and HR’s $4,620 share of IT plus the original $60,000 gives HR’s solved total of $64,620.

Step 5: Final allocated costs to operating departments

Department From HR From IT Total
Dept A $21,538 $23,076 $44,614
Dept B $32,310 $23,076 $55,386
Total $100,000

The total overhead costs allocated to the operational departments should still be $100,000.

For comparison, the direct method - which ignores HR and IT’s mutual usage entirely - would allocate about $44,000 to Dept A and $56,000 to Dept B from this same data. The reciprocal method shifts roughly $600 from Dept B to Dept A once each service department’s reliance on the other is recognized.

Watch out: the solved totals from Step 3 (HR = $64,620 and IT = $50,772) add up to $115,392 - more than the $100,000 actually spent. That’s because those totals include the reciprocal transfers between HR and IT, which never leave the service-department system. Only the amounts that land in Dept A and Dept B are real costs leaving the service departments, and those still total $100,000. When you work through Step 4, always multiply the Step 1 percentages by the solved totals ($64,620 and $50,772) - not by the original $60,000 and $40,000 - or you’ll understate the allocation.

Benefits of the reciprocal method

  • Most accurate method for reflecting true cost relationships
  • Fully incorporates mutual support between service departments
  • Recognizes all inter-service department interactions using mathematical equations
  • Provides better cost transparency and basis for pricing or budgeting decisions

Limitations of the reciprocal method

  • Mathematically complex; requires solving equations or matrix algebra
  • Difficult to implement without software support
  • May be impractical for organizations with many service departments

Reciprocal Method Overview

  • Most accurate allocation technique; fully recognizes mutual services between service departments (unlike direct/step-down methods)
  • Treats service departments as both providers and receivers until all costs flow to operating departments
  • Requires solving simultaneous equations to find each service department’s total adjusted cost

Setting Up the Calculation

  • Compute allocation percentages for each service department based on its cost driver (e.g., HR by employees, IT by computers)
  • Exclude a department’s own usage of its cost driver when calculating percentages (e.g., don’t count IT’s own computers)
  • Write equations where each service department’s total cost = its own direct costs + share received from the other service department(s)
    • e.g., HR=60,000+(9.10%×IT) and IT=40,000+(16.67%×HR)

Solving and Allocating

  • Substitute one equation into the other to solve for both total adjusted costs (solved totals include reciprocal transfers, so they exceed original direct costs)
  • Use the solved totals (not original direct costs) multiplied by Step 1 percentages to allocate to operating departments and back to the other service department
  • Final allocations to operating departments must still sum to the original total service department costs (e.g., $100,000), even though solved totals (HR + IT) exceed that sum due to internal transfers

Benefits vs. Limitations

  • Benefits: most accurate reflection of true cost relationships; captures all interdepartmental interactions; supports better pricing/budgeting decisions
  • Limitations: mathematically complex (requires equations/matrix algebra); hard without software; impractical with many service departments
  • Compared to direct method, reciprocal method shifts costs between operating departments (e.g., slightly more to Dept A, less to Dept B) by accounting for service departments’ mutual reliance

Sign up for free to take 7 quiz questions on this topic

Previous
Next  | 4.4.1 Supply chain management
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Allocation of service department costs: reciprocal method

Reciprocal method of allocation

The reciprocal method (also known as the algebraic method) provides the most accurate service department allocation technique by fully recognizing mutual services between service departments. Unlike the direct and step-down methods, which either ignore or partially account for inter-service support, the reciprocal method treats all service departments as both providers and receivers of services until all costs are allocated to operating departments.

How it works

The method involves setting up and solving simultaneous equations to reflect the reciprocal services. Once the total adjusted costs of each service department are computed (including the services they receive from each other), the costs are allocated to the operating departments using the usual cost drivers.

Example: Reciprocal allocation of HR and IT costs

Assume a company has the following departments:

Service departments:

  • Human Resources (HR): $60,000
  • Information Technology (IT): $40,000

Operating departments:

  • Department A
  • Department B
Department Number of employees Number of computers
HR 10 20
IT 50 20
Dept A 100 100
Dept B 150 100

Let’s allocate HR costs based on the number of employees and IT costs based on the number of computers.

Watch out: when you compute allocation percentages, exclude the department’s own cost driver count - for example, don’t count IT’s own 20 computers when allocating IT costs. You’re only distributing cost to the departments that actually receive the service, which under the reciprocal method includes the other service department.

Step 1: Calculate allocation percentages

HR Cost Allocation (based on employees):

Recipient dept Employees Proportion
IT 50 50 / 300 = 16.67%
Dept A 100 100 / 300 = 33.33%
Dept B 150 150 / 300 = 50.00%
Total 300 100%

The above means that the total IT cost to be allocated to the operational departments is the $40,000+16.67% of HR costs. This will be translated into an equation in the next step.

IT Cost Allocation (based on computers):

Recipient dept Computers Proportion
HR 20 20 / 220 = 9.10%
Dept A 100 100 / 220 = 45.45%
Dept B 100 100 / 220 = 45.45%
Total 220 100%

Note: 20 / 220 actually computes to 9.09%; it’s nudged up to 9.10% here so the three allocation percentages add up to exactly 100%.

The above means that the total HR cost to be allocated to the operational departments is the $60,000+9.10% of IT costs. This will be translated into an equation in the next step.

Step 2: Set up the equations

Let:

HR=Total cost of HR including IT’s allocation to HR

IT=Total cost of IT including HR’s allocation to IT

From the allocation logic above:

HR=60,000+(9.10%×IT)

IT=40,000+(16.67%×HR)

Step 3: Solve the equations

Substitute the first equation (HR) into the second (IT):

ITITITIT−0.01517 IT0.98483ITIT​=40,000+0.1667(60,000+0.0910 IT)=40,000+(0.1667×60,000)+(0.1667×0.0910 IT)=40,000+10,002+0.01517 IT=50,002=50,002=50,772​

Substitute back to solve for HR:

HR​=60,000+(9.10%×IT)=60,000+(9.10%×50,772)=60,000+4,620=64,620​

Step 4: Calculate the interdepartment costs

HR (total cost = $64,620) allocated based on employees using the original allocation rates in Step 1:

  • To IT: 0.1667 × 64,620 = $10,772
  • To Dept A: 0.3333 × 64,620 = $21,538
  • To Dept B: 0.5000 × 64,620 = $32,310

IT (total cost = $50,772) allocated based on computers using the original allocation rates in Step 1:

  • To HR: 0.0910 × 50,772 = $4,620
  • To Dept A: 0.4545 × 50,772 = $23,076
  • To Dept B: 0.4545 × 50,772 = $23,076

These reciprocal shares reconcile back to Step 3: IT’s $10,772 share of HR plus the original $40,000 gives IT’s solved total of $50,772, and HR’s $4,620 share of IT plus the original $60,000 gives HR’s solved total of $64,620.

Step 5: Final allocated costs to operating departments

Department From HR From IT Total
Dept A $21,538 $23,076 $44,614
Dept B $32,310 $23,076 $55,386
Total $100,000

The total overhead costs allocated to the operational departments should still be $100,000.

For comparison, the direct method - which ignores HR and IT’s mutual usage entirely - would allocate about $44,000 to Dept A and $56,000 to Dept B from this same data. The reciprocal method shifts roughly $600 from Dept B to Dept A once each service department’s reliance on the other is recognized.

Watch out: the solved totals from Step 3 (HR = $64,620 and IT = $50,772) add up to $115,392 - more than the $100,000 actually spent. That’s because those totals include the reciprocal transfers between HR and IT, which never leave the service-department system. Only the amounts that land in Dept A and Dept B are real costs leaving the service departments, and those still total $100,000. When you work through Step 4, always multiply the Step 1 percentages by the solved totals ($64,620 and $50,772) - not by the original $60,000 and $40,000 - or you’ll understate the allocation.

Benefits of the reciprocal method

  • Most accurate method for reflecting true cost relationships
  • Fully incorporates mutual support between service departments
  • Recognizes all inter-service department interactions using mathematical equations
  • Provides better cost transparency and basis for pricing or budgeting decisions

Limitations of the reciprocal method

  • Mathematically complex; requires solving equations or matrix algebra
  • Difficult to implement without software support
  • May be impractical for organizations with many service departments
Key points

Reciprocal Method Overview

  • Most accurate allocation technique; fully recognizes mutual services between service departments (unlike direct/step-down methods)
  • Treats service departments as both providers and receivers until all costs flow to operating departments
  • Requires solving simultaneous equations to find each service department’s total adjusted cost

Setting Up the Calculation

  • Compute allocation percentages for each service department based on its cost driver (e.g., HR by employees, IT by computers)
  • Exclude a department’s own usage of its cost driver when calculating percentages (e.g., don’t count IT’s own computers)
  • Write equations where each service department’s total cost = its own direct costs + share received from the other service department(s)
    • e.g., HR=60,000+(9.10%×IT) and IT=40,000+(16.67%×HR)

Solving and Allocating

  • Substitute one equation into the other to solve for both total adjusted costs (solved totals include reciprocal transfers, so they exceed original direct costs)
  • Use the solved totals (not original direct costs) multiplied by Step 1 percentages to allocate to operating departments and back to the other service department
  • Final allocations to operating departments must still sum to the original total service department costs (e.g., $100,000), even though solved totals (HR + IT) exceed that sum due to internal transfers

Benefits vs. Limitations

  • Benefits: most accurate reflection of true cost relationships; captures all interdepartmental interactions; supports better pricing/budgeting decisions
  • Limitations: mathematically complex (requires equations/matrix algebra); hard without software; impractical with many service departments
  • Compared to direct method, reciprocal method shifts costs between operating departments (e.g., slightly more to Dept A, less to Dept B) by accounting for service departments’ mutual reliance

More from Overhead costs

  • Overhead classification and cost behavior
  • Overhead allocation methods
  • Overapplied and underapplied overhead
  • Allocation of service department costs: overview
  • Allocation of service department costs: direct method