You learned several options strategies in the options unit. In this chapter, we’ll discuss the various tax consequences of options. The topics covered require a baseline knowledge of options; click the link above to review the various tested strategies. In general, you’ll need to know the tax consequences relating to five topics:
When an investor buys or sells an option, there are three potential outcomes:
We’ll discuss the expiration of options contracts in this section. When an options contract expires, the result is a capital gain or loss equal to the premium. It’s as simple as that! Let’s take a look at an example:
An investor goes long 1 ABC Jan 50 call at $4 when ABC’s market price is $51. Several months later, the ABC’s market price falls to $49 and stays there until expiration. What is the tax consequence?
Can you figure it out?
Answer = $400 capital loss
The investor buys a call, and it subsequently goes “out of the money” (no intrinsic value). Remember, calls expire if the market price is below the strike price at expiration. The investor paid $400 for the option and didn’t get any use out of it. Therefore, they realize a capital loss of $400.
Let’s try another example:
One August 80 put is written for a premium of $7 when the underlying stock’s market price is $78. Just prior to expiration, the stock’s market price rises to $90. What is the tax consequence?
Answer = $700 capital gain
The writer sells a put, and it subsequently goes “out of the money” (no intrinsic value). Puts expire if the stock’s market price is above the strike price at expiration. The investor received $700 for the option and wasn’t assigned (exercised). Therefore, they realize a capital gain of $700.
Before an exercise or expiration, an options investor can trade (close out) of the position. This concept was covered in the issuance & the market chapter. From a tax perspective, investors realize capital gains or losses equal to a contract’s overall gain or loss. Let’s take a look at an example:
An investor goes long 1 XYZ Dec 35 put at $5 when XYZ’s market price is $36. XYZ’s market price falls to $32, and the investor closes the contract at intrinsic value. What is the tax consequence?
Answer = $200 capital loss
The price paid for the option must be compared to the premium received at the closing sale to determine the overall gain or loss. The put cost $500 to establish the position. When the market falls to $32, the contract is “in the money” by $3. Therefore, the investor performs a closing sale of $300. Buying the contract for $500 and later selling it for $300 results in a net $200 capital loss.
One more example:
A client of yours writes 1 ZZZ Sep 60 call for a premium of $4. A few months later, the investor closes the position at $3. What is the tax consequence?
Answer = $100 capital gain
The client initially sold (wrote) the contract for $400. Later, the client performs a closing purchase (must buy the contract to close a short position) at $300. This results in a net $100 capital gain.
Taxes related to exercising contracts are more complicated than expiration or trading. Instead of a capital gain or loss, an exercise establishes cost basis or sales proceeds on the underlying security (typically stock). Cost basis represents the overall cost to purchase a security, while sales proceeds represents the overall liquidation value to sell a security. Let’s go through an example together:
An investor goes long 1 BCD Apr 25 call at $3. BCD’s market price rises to $30, and the investor exercises the option. What is the tax consequence?
The investor buys 100 BCD shares at $25 when the call is exercised. Because they’re buying stock, the investor establishes cost basis. If they sold stock instead, the investor would establish sales proceeds. Determining if it’s cost basis or sales proceeds has nothing to do with buying or selling the option - it’s all about the action taken with the stock at exercise!
A $25 cost basis is the starting point. The option premium also needs to be factored in. Because the investor bought the option as well, we add the premium to the cost basis. The cost basis reflects the total cost of obtaining a security. In this scenario, the investor bought the option for $3 and the stock for $25, leading to an overall cost basis of $28 (per share).
A way to double-check your answer is to find the option’s breakeven. The cost basis (or sales proceeds) will always equal the option’s breakeven. You can find the call’s breakeven by adding the strike price ($25) to the premium ($3), which adds up to $28. This is a trick you can use to answer exercise-based tax questions.
Let’s see if you can make it through three more examples on your own:
A CDE Sep 75 call is written for $6 when CDE’s market price is $74. CDE’s stock price rises to $79, and the option is assigned. What is the tax consequence for the writer?
Answer = $81 sales proceeds (per share)
When the short (written) call is assigned (exercised), the investor is forced to sell 100 CDE shares at $75. Because they’re selling stock, the investor establishes sales proceeds.
A $75 sales proceeds is the starting point. The option premium also needs to be factored in. Because the investor sold the option as well, the premium is added to the sales proceeds. Sales proceeds measures the liquidation (sale) value of a security. In this scenario, the investor sold the option for $6 and the stock for $75, leading to an overall sales proceeds of $81 per share (or $8,100 overall).
Let’s look at some put contract examples:
An investor goes long 100 shares of PEP stock at $120. A few months later, they go long 1 PEP Feb 120 put at $9 when PEP’s market price is $115. A few weeks later, PEP’s market price falls to $105, and the investor exercises the option. What is the tax consequence for both the stock and option?
Answers:
This question is tricky because it adds stock into the mix. The easiest part is the cost basis, which is the price paid for PEP stock ($120).
When the long put is exercised, the investor sells the 100 shares of PEP stock at $120. Because they’re selling stock, the investor establishes sales proceeds.
A $120 sales proceeds is the starting point. The option premium also needs to be factored in. The option was purchased, so the premium is subtracted from the sales proceeds. The investor bought the put for $9 and sold the stock for $120, leading to an overall sales proceeds of $111 per share.
To find the overall tax consequence, compare the $120 cost basis to the $111 sales proceeds. This results in a net capital loss of $9 per share, or $900 overall.
One last example involving put contracts:
An investor writes 1 CBA Jun 150 put at $12 when CBA’s market price is $145. CBA’s market price falls slightly to $143, and the option is assigned. What is the tax consequence?
Answer = $138 cost basis (per share)
The investor buys 100 CBA shares at $150 when the option is assigned (exercised). Because they’re buying stock, the investor establishes cost basis.
A cost basis of $150 is the starting point. The option premium also needs to be factored in. The option was sold, so the premium is subtracted from the cost basis. The investor sold the put for $12 and bought the stock for $150, leading to a total cost basis of $138 per share (or $13,800 overall).
This video summarizes the option taxation concepts we’ve discussed so far:
We discussed how long puts protect long stock positions in the hedging strategies chapter. A long put can affect a stock’s holding period (long-term or short-term). There are three potential scenarios when an investor owns stock and purchases a protective put.
If an investor buys the stock and the put on the same day, the position is known as a married put. The reason for the name relates to how the position is viewed for tax purposes - it’s like the two positions come together as one. The option premium is added to the cost basis of the stock, and it’s like the option doesn’t exist (for tax purposes). For example:
An investor purchases 100 shares of WMT stock at $170 per share and goes long 1 WMT 165 put at $4 on the same day.
The cost basis of the stock is $174, which is equal to the purchase price of the stock ($170) combined with the put premium ($4). Even if the put expires, there is no capital loss reported for the option (unlike other circumstances involving an option expiration). The $4 premium is reflected in the stock’s cost basis, which reduces tax liabilities when the stock is sold (a higher cost basis results in lower gains). Married puts do not affect the stock’s holding period. If the stock is held for over a year, the sale will lock in a long-term capital gain or loss. If held for a year or less, a short-term capital gain or loss occurs.
If the put is bought on any other day than the day the stock is purchased, it can affect the holding period. Also, the put’s premium is not added to the stock’s cost basis (they’re kept separate). The IRS institutes this rule to prevent investors from taking advantage of holding period rules. Let’s explore a scenario:
An investor purchases 100 shares of WMT stock at $170 per share. WMT’s stock price goes to $192 eleven months later, and the investor goes long 1 WMT 190 put at $6.
The IRS assumes investors are attempting to “extend” their holding period to a long-term gain without risk exposure. Think about it - even if the market price falls, the investor can exercise the put and sell the stock at $190. Being a month away from locking in a long-term gain, are they at risk of losing anything? Not really.
For this reason, the IRS nullifies and resets the investor’s holding period to zero until the put is closed out or expires. Essentially, the investor has no holding period until the put is gone. If the put is closed out or expires, the holding period starts again from zero.
One exception to the rule discussed above is if the shares were already long-term. For example:
An investor purchases 100 shares of WMT stock at $170 per share. WMT’s stock price goes to $192 thirteen months later, and the investor goes long 1 WMT 190 put at $6.
Thirteen months into owning the stock, the stock’s holding period is already long-term. In this scenario, the holding period is unaffected.
When an options contract is traded or expires, the reported gain or loss is almost always short-term. Standard contracts maintain a maximum expiration of 9 months. A security held for a year or less is considered short-term and is subject to higher tax rates.
However, Long Term Equity Anticipation Securities (LEAPS) contracts maintain expirations of up to 39 months. If an investor buys a LEAPS option, holds it for over a year, closes the position or allows it to expire, a long-term gain or loss is realized.
While this is true for long LEAPS contracts, it does not apply to short LEAPS. The IRS does not consider any short security (including short stock) eligible for a long-term holding period. Even if an investor goes short LEAPS for three years, a short-term gain or loss is realized when the contract is closed out or expires. The belief is short securities are never truly “held,” which always leads to a short-term holding period.
Sign up for free to take 24 quiz questions on this topic