VOH cost variance summary
Common examples of VOH include indirect materials (e.g., lubricants, cleaning supplies), indirect labor (e.g., wages of machine operators’ assistants), and utilities like electricity tied to production.
The cost drivers for VOH depend on the nature of the production process and the type of overhead incurred. For instance if VOH is closely tied to material usage, the cost driver might be the quantity of materials used. If VOH is more closely linked to indirect labor, the cost driver could be labor hours worked.
In practice, if the CMA exam problem does not explicitly state the cost driver, labor hours are often used as the default for VOH. For this discussion, we will refer to labor hours as the cost driver but it equally applies if the cost driver of the VOH is indirect materials.
The computation of VOH variances is identical to the method used for direct labor variances. Understanding these variances provides insight into cost control and production efficiency for overhead costs, which often represent a significant portion of total manufacturing costs.
The basic formula of the VOH cost variance is as follows:
Oftentimes the first step in solving overhead variance questions is calculating the standard VOH per unit or the Standard VOH Rate (referred above as the “Standard Rate”). When this is not provided, we need to calculate it manually by using inputs from the master budget:
The variable overhead cost variance is broken down into different components to isolate the sources of deviations of actual VOH costs from standard VOH costs. The variance primarily arises from two sources:
- differences between the standard rate and the actual rate paid for VOH (Variable Overhead Spending Variance); and
- differences between the standard hours allowed and the actual hours worked (Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance).
Overview of variance formula
The total of all VOH variances should equal the variable overhead cost variance. This provides a useful way to verify the accuracy of your calculations by comparing the sum of the individual variances to the total VOH cost variance. You can revisit the illustration below once you have finished reading the different components of the VOH cost variance.
Variable overhead spending variance
The formula for calculating variable overhead spending variance is:
It can also be expressed in terms of the formulas:
Where:
- is the actual VOH rate
- is the standard VOH rate. As mentioned before, this could be required to be calculated using the master budget.
- are the actual units (could be hours or units of indirect materials) of VOH that was incurred in production
The VOH Spending variance reflects the difference between the actual VOH rate paid per hour and the standard VOH rate established in the budget.
Understanding the reasons behind these variances is essential to avoid confusion. For instance, when the actual indirect labor rate exceeds the standard rate, it creates an unfavorable variance, as higher indirect labor costs negatively impact the company’s financial performance. By analyzing the root causes of these variances, organizations can interpret their implications more accurately and take appropriate corrective actions.
Variable overhead efficiency variance
The formula for calculating variable overhead efficiency variance is:
It can also be expressed in terms of the formulas:
Where:
- is the standard VOH rate. As mentioned before, this could be required to be calculated using the master budget.
- are the actual units (could be hours or units of indirect materials) of VOH that was incurred in production
- are the standard VOH that would have been incurred at the level of actual production achieved
When applying inputs into the formula, a positive variance indicates a favorable variance, while a negative variance signifies an unfavorable variance. However, to avoid getting confused with the mathematical signs, it is essential to understand the reasons behind these variances to interpret them correctly.
For instance, if the standard VOH hours allowed for production exceed the actual VOH hours worked, this reflects VOH efficiency. Such a scenario is considered favorable for the company, as it indicates that less indirect labor time was required than anticipated, leading to cost savings and improved operational performance.

