Achievable logoAchievable logo
CMA Part 1
Sign in
Sign up
Purchase
Textbook
Practice exams
Support
How it works
Exam catalog
Mountain with a flag at the peak
Textbook
1. External financial reporting decisions
2. Planning, budgeting, and forecasting
3. Performance management
4. Cost management
5. Internal control
6. Technology and analytics
Achievable logoAchievable logo
1.2.7.4 Assurance warranty approach
Achievable CMA Part 1
1. External financial reporting decisions
1.2. Financial transactions
1.2.7. Warranty
Our CMA Part 1 course is currently in development and is a work-in-progress.

Assurance warranty approach

6 min read
Font
Discuss
Share
Feedback

The accounting for an assurance-type warranty is as follows:

Journal entry at the time of sale

There are no journal entries at the time of sale for an assurance type warranty because the warranty is not a separate performance obligation. Accordingly, the transaction price does not need to be allocated to the warranty.

This is common for warranties that cannot be purchased or negotiated separately because these only provide assurance that the goods will function as intended.

Journal entry as the performance obligation is satisfied

This is not applicable since the warranty is not a separate performance obligation under an assurance type warranty.

Journal entry for estimated warranty expenses

Assurance-type warranties are accounted for as loss contingencies under ASC 450 (warranty scope guidance sits in ASC 460), recognized when both of the following are true:

  • the loss is probable, and
  • the amount can be reasonably estimated.

As a result, they are recorded at the time of the sale of the goods or services.

The warranty is recorded as warranty expense (a loss-contingency accrual under ASC 450/460) and a liability on the balance sheet at the time of sale, using a reasonable estimate of the cost to repair or replace a defective good or service.

In the CMA exams the calculation of the estimated cost of the warranty can be a straight-forward calculation using:

  • a percentage of sales
  • warranty cost per unit sold, or
  • any other manner of calculation.

No matter what approach is used, we should determine the total warranty liability for all future periods covered by the warranty. This approach results in a warranty liability that may have a current or non-current portion depending on the period covered by the assurance type warranty.

The journal entry is as follows:

Account Debit Credit Financial statement element
Warranty expense - assurance type XXX Expense
Estimated warranty liability - current XXX Liability
Estimated warranty liability - non-current XXX Liability
To record estimated warranty costs under an assurance type warranty

The current portion is the estimated cost within one year from the end of the balance sheet date. The non-current portion is the expected cost to be paid beyond one year.

As mentioned before, this process is not performed in the service type warranty approach.

Journal entry for the actual costs of the providing warranty

Since the loss (with income statement impact) has already been recorded in the estimation process, a warranty claim only reduces the liability account. The entry is as follows:

Account Debit Credit Financial statement element
Estimated warranty liability XXX Liability
Cash XXX Asset
To record costs incurred related to fulfilling the assurance type warranty

Under the service warranty approach, this journal entry has a debit to the warranty expense account.

Common pitfall: Fulfilling a claim under an assurance-type warranty only reduces the liability (debit estimated warranty liability, credit cash) - it’s not a new expense, since the expense was accrued at the time of sale. Under a service-type warranty, by contrast, the claim is expensed as incurred, because that warranty is a separate performance obligation.

Classification matters too: an assurance-type warranty only promises the product works as intended and can’t be purchased separately, while a service-type warranty provides extra coverage and can be purchased separately. That distinction - plus whether the loss is probable and reasonably estimable - decides which model applies.

Example: Recording the sale-related warranty entries

Riverside Co. sells appliances with a two-year assurance-type warranty and estimates warranty costs at 2% of warranty-eligible sales of $500,000, or $10,000. It expects $9,000 of that liability to be paid within a year and $1,000 beyond a year.

Estimation entry:

  • Debit warranty expense - assurance type: $10,000
  • Credit estimated warranty liability - current: $9,000
  • Credit estimated warranty liability - non-current: $1,000

Riverside later pays $6,000 cash on warranty claims.

Claim entry:

  • Debit estimated warranty liability: $6,000
  • Credit cash: $6,000

Answer: The claim entry has no income statement effect - the $10,000 expense was already recognized at the time of sale.

Year-end procedures

For assurance-type warranties, year-end procedures are important to evaluate the balance of the liability for estimated warranty liability at the end of the period. The company should assess the following:

Determination of expired warranties still in liability

The liabilities related to expired warranties at the end of the period should be removed by reversing the journal entry in the estimation process. This removal is a change in accounting estimate, not a separate accounting model - it runs through the same warranty expense account as the original accrual, just in reverse:

Account Debit Credit Financial statement element
Estimated warranty liability XXX Liability
Warranty expense - assurance type XXX Expense
To record reversal of remaining liabilities from expired warranties

Assessment of the warranty liability ending balance

Determine if the year-end balance of the estimated warranty liability based on the facts and circumstances is appropriate. If the liability is not enough, we should record additional warranty expenses and if the liability is too high, a reversal should be recorded like in the previous journal entry.

CMA exam candidates should also be able to compute the ending balance of the warranty liability. The below pro forma calculation can be used which also follows the debit and credit convention. Remember that the normal balance of a warranty liability is in credit.

Continuing the Riverside Co. example: assume a beginning balance of $8,000 and $1,000 of expired, unclaimed coverage at year-end. Combined with the $10,000 expense and $6,000 of claims above:

Warranty liability, beginning balance $8,000
Warranty expense (as calculated) $10,000
Warranty claims ($6,000)
Expired warranty ($1,000)
Warranty liability, ending balance $11,000

Assurance Type Warranty: Accounting Overview

  • Not a separate performance obligation
  • No journal entry at time of sale for warranty
  • Only provides assurance goods function as intended

Estimated Warranty Expenses

  • Accounted for as contingencies under ASC 460
  • Record liability and expense at sale if:
    • Probable
    • Reasonably estimable
  • Estimation methods:
    • Percentage of sales
    • Cost per unit sold
  • Liability split:
    • Current portion: costs within one year
    • Non-current portion: costs beyond one year

Journal Entries

  • At sale (estimation):
    • Debit: Warranty expense
    • Credit: Estimated warranty liability (current and/or non-current)
  • When actual costs incurred:
    • Debit: Estimated warranty liability
    • Credit: Cash (or other asset)

Year-End Procedures

  • Review estimated warranty liability balance
  • Remove expired warranty liabilities:
    • Reverse original estimation entry
  • Assess adequacy of liability:
    • Increase expense if liability too low
    • Reverse if liability too high

Warranty Liability Calculation

  • Ending balance formula:
    • Beginning balance
      • Warranty expense (new estimates)
    • – Warranty claims paid
    • – Expired warranty amounts
  • Normal balance: credit

Sign up for free to take 6 quiz questions on this topic

Previous
Next  | 1.2.8.1 Learning outcomes
All rights reserved ©2016 - 2026 Achievable, Inc.

Assurance warranty approach

The accounting for an assurance-type warranty is as follows:

Journal entry at the time of sale

There are no journal entries at the time of sale for an assurance type warranty because the warranty is not a separate performance obligation. Accordingly, the transaction price does not need to be allocated to the warranty.

This is common for warranties that cannot be purchased or negotiated separately because these only provide assurance that the goods will function as intended.

Journal entry as the performance obligation is satisfied

This is not applicable since the warranty is not a separate performance obligation under an assurance type warranty.

Journal entry for estimated warranty expenses

Assurance-type warranties are accounted for as loss contingencies under ASC 450 (warranty scope guidance sits in ASC 460), recognized when both of the following are true:

  • the loss is probable, and
  • the amount can be reasonably estimated.

As a result, they are recorded at the time of the sale of the goods or services.

The warranty is recorded as warranty expense (a loss-contingency accrual under ASC 450/460) and a liability on the balance sheet at the time of sale, using a reasonable estimate of the cost to repair or replace a defective good or service.

In the CMA exams the calculation of the estimated cost of the warranty can be a straight-forward calculation using:

  • a percentage of sales
  • warranty cost per unit sold, or
  • any other manner of calculation.

No matter what approach is used, we should determine the total warranty liability for all future periods covered by the warranty. This approach results in a warranty liability that may have a current or non-current portion depending on the period covered by the assurance type warranty.

The journal entry is as follows:

Account Debit Credit Financial statement element
Warranty expense - assurance type XXX Expense
Estimated warranty liability - current XXX Liability
Estimated warranty liability - non-current XXX Liability
To record estimated warranty costs under an assurance type warranty

The current portion is the estimated cost within one year from the end of the balance sheet date. The non-current portion is the expected cost to be paid beyond one year.

As mentioned before, this process is not performed in the service type warranty approach.

Journal entry for the actual costs of the providing warranty

Since the loss (with income statement impact) has already been recorded in the estimation process, a warranty claim only reduces the liability account. The entry is as follows:

Account Debit Credit Financial statement element
Estimated warranty liability XXX Liability
Cash XXX Asset
To record costs incurred related to fulfilling the assurance type warranty

Under the service warranty approach, this journal entry has a debit to the warranty expense account.

Common pitfall: Fulfilling a claim under an assurance-type warranty only reduces the liability (debit estimated warranty liability, credit cash) - it’s not a new expense, since the expense was accrued at the time of sale. Under a service-type warranty, by contrast, the claim is expensed as incurred, because that warranty is a separate performance obligation.

Classification matters too: an assurance-type warranty only promises the product works as intended and can’t be purchased separately, while a service-type warranty provides extra coverage and can be purchased separately. That distinction - plus whether the loss is probable and reasonably estimable - decides which model applies.

Example: Recording the sale-related warranty entries

Riverside Co. sells appliances with a two-year assurance-type warranty and estimates warranty costs at 2% of warranty-eligible sales of $500,000, or $10,000. It expects $9,000 of that liability to be paid within a year and $1,000 beyond a year.

Estimation entry:

  • Debit warranty expense - assurance type: $10,000
  • Credit estimated warranty liability - current: $9,000
  • Credit estimated warranty liability - non-current: $1,000

Riverside later pays $6,000 cash on warranty claims.

Claim entry:

  • Debit estimated warranty liability: $6,000
  • Credit cash: $6,000

Answer: The claim entry has no income statement effect - the $10,000 expense was already recognized at the time of sale.

Year-end procedures

For assurance-type warranties, year-end procedures are important to evaluate the balance of the liability for estimated warranty liability at the end of the period. The company should assess the following:

Determination of expired warranties still in liability

The liabilities related to expired warranties at the end of the period should be removed by reversing the journal entry in the estimation process. This removal is a change in accounting estimate, not a separate accounting model - it runs through the same warranty expense account as the original accrual, just in reverse:

Account Debit Credit Financial statement element
Estimated warranty liability XXX Liability
Warranty expense - assurance type XXX Expense
To record reversal of remaining liabilities from expired warranties

Assessment of the warranty liability ending balance

Determine if the year-end balance of the estimated warranty liability based on the facts and circumstances is appropriate. If the liability is not enough, we should record additional warranty expenses and if the liability is too high, a reversal should be recorded like in the previous journal entry.

CMA exam candidates should also be able to compute the ending balance of the warranty liability. The below pro forma calculation can be used which also follows the debit and credit convention. Remember that the normal balance of a warranty liability is in credit.

Continuing the Riverside Co. example: assume a beginning balance of $8,000 and $1,000 of expired, unclaimed coverage at year-end. Combined with the $10,000 expense and $6,000 of claims above:

Warranty liability, beginning balance $8,000
Warranty expense (as calculated) $10,000
Warranty claims ($6,000)
Expired warranty ($1,000)
Warranty liability, ending balance $11,000
Key points

Assurance Type Warranty: Accounting Overview

  • Not a separate performance obligation
  • No journal entry at time of sale for warranty
  • Only provides assurance goods function as intended

Estimated Warranty Expenses

  • Accounted for as contingencies under ASC 460
  • Record liability and expense at sale if:
    • Probable
    • Reasonably estimable
  • Estimation methods:
    • Percentage of sales
    • Cost per unit sold
  • Liability split:
    • Current portion: costs within one year
    • Non-current portion: costs beyond one year

Journal Entries

  • At sale (estimation):
    • Debit: Warranty expense
    • Credit: Estimated warranty liability (current and/or non-current)
  • When actual costs incurred:
    • Debit: Estimated warranty liability
    • Credit: Cash (or other asset)

Year-End Procedures

  • Review estimated warranty liability balance
  • Remove expired warranty liabilities:
    • Reverse original estimation entry
  • Assess adequacy of liability:
    • Increase expense if liability too low
    • Reverse if liability too high

Warranty Liability Calculation

  • Ending balance formula:
    • Beginning balance
      • Warranty expense (new estimates)
    • – Warranty claims paid
    • – Expired warranty amounts
  • Normal balance: credit

More from Warranty

  • Learning outcomes
  • Warranty introduction
  • Service warranty approach