Learning outcomes
The learning outcome statements related to the differences between US GAAP and IFRS comparisons are as follows:
- Expense recognition, with respect to share-based payments and employee benefits
- Intangible assets, with respect to development costs and revaluation
- Inventories, with respect to costing methods, valuation, and write-downs (e.g., LIFO)
- Leases, with respect to lessee operating and finance leases
- Long-lived assets, with respect to revaluation, depreciation, and capitalization of borrowing costs
- Impairment of assets, with respect to determination, calculation, and reversal of loss
Items 2-6 were covered under US GAAP in earlier chapters; the GAAP-vs-IFRS comparisons for those areas follow later. Share-based payments and employee benefits are covered only here: US GAAP allows straight-line or accelerated expense recognition for graded-vesting awards, while IFRS requires the accelerated method. Both standards recognize defined-benefit actuarial gains/losses in OCI, but US GAAP later amortizes them into profit or loss (the corridor approach), while IFRS never recycles them. Exam tip: Part 1 tests US GAAP - LIFO, impairment-loss reversal, and intangible revaluation are the top GAAP/IFRS divergences to remember.