The min-max extremes strategy is one of the most useful time-saving strategies on the GRE. The basic idea is to find only the minimum and maximum possible values (the extreme values), instead of spending time solving for every possible value.
This strategy works for quantitative comparison questions and for certain multiple-choice questions. The overall approach is the same, and you’ll see examples of both.
Consider this example:
A square has a double-digit perimeter that is also a multiple of 4.
Quantity A: The area of the square
Quantity B: 600
There are a few clues that the min-max strategy will work well here:
Here’s how to apply the min-max strategy to quantitative comparison questions:
Keep in mind that Quantity A can take many values besides the minimum and maximum. But in a quant comparison question, the extremes are enough: if the known value is above both extremes, below both extremes, equal to both extremes, or between them, you can determine the correct relationship without listing every case.
Let’s solve the example:
A square has a double-digit perimeter that is also a multiple of 4.
Quantity A: The area of the square
Quantity B: 600
Find the minimum and maximum possible values for Quantity A, then answer the question.
Answer: Quantity B is greater
Start with the maximum possible area by using the maximum possible perimeter.
At this point, you can already choose B: even the maximum possible value of Quantity A (576) is less than 600.
For completeness, check the minimum possible area.
Quantity B is greater than both extremes for Quantity A (576 and 9). Therefore, Quantity B is greater than Quantity A in every valid case.
This strategy is also useful for select all that apply multiple-choice questions. Find the minimum and maximum possible values, then select the choices that match the extremes and any choices that fall within the range.
This can save time because anything outside the range is guaranteed to be impossible. (There’s an important caveat in the sidenote below.) This approach is most useful when the answer choices are numeric and listed in ascending order. It’s usually less helpful when choices include variables or are not ordered.
Here’s an example:
A pizza shop delivers pizza to its customers. On Saturday, more than two-fifths of the orders were delivered late because of traffic. On Sunday, only one out of ten orders were delivered late. How many deliveries might have been late if there were a total of 65 deliveries over the weekend? Select all that apply.
A. 8
B. 9
C. 26
D. 56
E. 65
Try applying the min-max strategy to this question.
Answers: B, C, D
To maximize the total number of late deliveries:
The smallest number of Sunday orders that still allows “one out of ten” to make sense is 10 orders (so 1 late). That leaves orders on Saturday.
Now maximize Saturday’s late deliveries. “More than two-fifths” allows as many as all of them to be late, so Saturday can have 55 late deliveries.
To minimize the total number of late deliveries:
Use 60 orders on Sunday, which gives late deliveries. That leaves orders on Saturday.
On Saturday, more than of 5 orders must be late:
So the minimum total late is .
The possible number of late deliveries must be between 9 and 56, inclusive. Select the answer choices that fall in that range:
Notice that one incorrect choice (8) is just below the minimum. ETS often places choices near the boundary to test whether you’re reading the constraint carefully. If you misread “more than two-fifths” as “at least two-fifths,” you might incorrectly include 8.
Sign up for free to take 4 quiz questions on this topic